GeForce GTX 580M vs 560M |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 580M vs 560M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 580MGPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 20,550.5 | vs | 1,820 | More than 11.2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better PassMark score | 2,286 | vs | 1,554 | More than 45% better PassMark score | |||
| Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 13,315 | vs | 8,003.5 | More than 65% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Much better T-Rex score | 3,358.98 | vs | 3,351.06 | Almost the same | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | vs | 60 GB/s | 60% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Much higher diablo III framerate | 70.9 fps | vs | 44.2 fps | More than 60% higher diablo III framerate | |||
| More texture mapping units | 64 | vs | 32 | Twice as many texture mapping units | |||
| Slightly higher texture rate | 39.7 GTexel/s | vs | 24.8 GTexel/s | More than 60% higher texture rate | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 24 | 8 more render output processors | |||
| Wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 192 bit | Around 35% wider memory bus | |||
| Slightly more shading units | 384 | vs | 192 | Twice as many shading units | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 750 MHz | vs | 625 MHz | 20% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Slightly better video composition score | 29.7 frames/s | vs | 25.33 frames/s | More than 15% better video composition score | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 954 | vs | 677 | More than 40% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark06 score | 15,327 | vs | 3,116.5 | Around 5x better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Higher clock speed | 775 MHz | vs | 620 MHz | 25% higher clock speed | |||
| Lower TDP | 75W | vs | 100W | 25% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
