GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 650 Ti Boost vs 560 Ti


Real world tests using the latest 3D games

crysis: warhead (2013), Crysis: Warhead (2012), Batman: Arkham City and 3 more


Synthetic tests to measure overall performance

Passmark, 3DMark Vantage Texture Fill, 3DMark 11 Graphics and 2 more

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

SmallLuxGPU 2.0d4, Civilization 5 Texture Decomposition (2013) and 3 more

Noise and Power

How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load

TDP, Idle Noise Level, Load Noise Level, Idle Power Consumption and 1 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Reasons to consider the
Generic GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Report a correction
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 6,108 MHz vs 4,200 MHz More than 45% higher effective memory clock speed
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Higher clock speed 1,006 MHz vs 950 MHz More than 5% higher clock speed
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 21,830 vs 17,648 Around 25% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,527 MHz vs 1,050 MHz More than 45% higher memory clock speed
More energy-efficient load power consumption 289W vs 322W More than 10% more energy-efficient load power consumption
More shading units 768 vs 384 Twice as many shading units
Better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score 250.1 vs 225.5 More than 10% better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score
Higher battlefield 3 framerate 73.6 fps vs 57.3 fps Around 30% higher battlefield 3 framerate
Lower TDP 134W vs 170W More than 20% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Reasons to consider the
MSI GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Report a correction
Better passmark score 3,546 vs 2,686 More than 30% better passmark score
Significantly quieter load noise level 41.2 dB vs 47.4 dB Around 15% quieter load noise level
More render output processors 32 vs 24 8 more render output processors
Quieter idle noise level 40 dB vs 40.8 dB Almost the same
Better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2012) score 175.6 vs 137.1 Around 30% better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2012) score
Better CLBenchmark raytrace score 132,987 vs 87,206 More than 50% better CLBenchmark raytrace score
Better SmallLuxGPU 2.0d4 score 6,800 vs 3,400 2x better SmallLuxGPU 2.0d4 score
Wider memory bus 256 bit vs 192 bit Around 35% wider memory bus
Higher civilization 5 framerate 66.1 fps vs 54.1 fps More than 20% higher civilization 5 framerate

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs 560 Ti

Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance

3DMark Vantage (Texture Fill) Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX performance

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

Crysis: Warhead (2013) 1920x1080 - Enthusiast Quality + 4xAA

Batman: Arkham City 1920x1200 - Extreme quality + FXAA-HIGH

SmallLux GPU 2.0d4 Measures compute performance using OpenCL to do 3D rendering

Reviews Word on the street

GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost  vs 560 Ti 

Gaming noise is much improved too, which should result in a really quiet gaming experience.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost


Showing 8 comments.
These tests are COMPLETELY WRONG! 650 ti boost is much better, i have no doubt about that because i have used both of these 2 cards in the same system. It's actually that 560Ti can't even be an opponent to 650 Ti. Sorry but this is the truth with a right observation :)
He was right when he posted, two years ago, geniuses.
I'm not so sure about that but the GTX 560 ti is cheaper than the GTX 650 ti boost which is $60 more than the 560.
umm no the GTX 560 ti on amazon is about $70 GTX 650 ti boost is $130 at least in America i'm not sure where the hell you're from or if you had meant to say the other way around.
they are almost identical as the test say... trust me, i make a test with these two cards (the gtx 650 tib was for my brother) and i got really similar fps (sometimes the gtx 560 ti wins, while sometimes the gtx 650 tib is better, with most of times of identical fps).
ehm... i don't think the gtx 650 ti boost only costs 130 dollars... you usually need 160 or more to buy it... and you can found a gtx 560 ti 448 cores (faster than the gtx 650 ti boost) at a lower price, so... yeah, the gtx 560 ti is still the best of the two
650Ti boost is better , this test is not true because my boost have pixel filtrate 25Gpixel,66Gtexel... etc ASUS GTX650TIB
This really shows how overpriced the 560 ti is. These are almost identical yet the 650 Ti Boost is half the price
comments powered by Disqus