Winner
MSI GeForce GTX 560 Ti
GPUBoss recommends the MSI GeForce GTX 560 Ti based on its .
See full details GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs 560 Ti |
Released March, 2013
Generic GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- 1 GHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
6.8 Out of 10
by techPowerUp! (Apr, 2013)In this review, we test the EVGA GTX 650 Ti Boost SuperClocked, which, as the name suggests, is overclocked out of the box to a base clock frequency of 1072 MHz; quite a large increase over the 980 MHz of the reference design.
VS
Released March, 2011
MSI GeForce GTX 560 Ti
- 950 MHz
- 1 GB GDDR5
6.9 Out of 10
by techPowerUp! (Jan, 2011)If 800+ MHz core clock wasn't spectacularly high enough for Fermi architecture's standards, the GTX 560 Ti lets you overclock close to the 1 GHz mark.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 650 Ti Boost vs 560 Ti
Gaming | |
Real world tests using the latest 3D games | |
| crysis: warhead (2013), Crysis: Warhead (2012), Batman: Arkham City and 3 more | |
Benchmarks | |
Synthetic tests to measure overall performance | |
| Passmark, 3DMark Vantage Texture Fill, 3DMark 11 Graphics and 2 more | |
Compute Performance | |
General computing tests executed on the GPU | |
| SmallLuxGPU 2.0d4, Civilization 5 Texture Decomposition (2013) and 3 more | |
Noise and Power | |
How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load | |
| TDP, Idle Noise Level, Load Noise Level, Idle Power Consumption and 1 more | |
GPUBoss Score | |
Gaming, Benchmarks, Compute Performance and Noise and Power | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | MSI GeForce GTX 560 TiGPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 6,108 MHz | vs | 4,200 MHz | More than 45% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Higher clock speed | 1,006 MHz | vs | 950 MHz | More than 5% higher clock speed | |||
| Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 21,830 | vs | 17,648 | Around 25% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Slightly better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 5,770 | vs | 4,013 | Around 45% better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
| Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,527 MHz | vs | 1,050 MHz | More than 45% higher memory clock speed | |||
| More energy-efficient load power consumption | 289W | vs | 322W | More than 10% more energy-efficient load power consumption | |||
| More shading units | 768 | vs | 384 | Twice as many shading units | |||
| Higher battlefield 3 framerate | 73.6 fps | vs | 57.3 fps | Around 30% higher battlefield 3 framerate | |||
| Better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score | 250.1 | vs | 225.5 | More than 10% better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score | |||
| Lower TDP | 134W | vs | 170W | More than 20% lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| Better passmark score | 3,540 | vs | 2,708 | More than 30% better passmark score | |||
| Significantly quieter load noise level | 41.2 dB | vs | 47.4 dB | Around 15% quieter load noise level | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 24 | 8 more render output processors | |||
| Better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2012) score | 175.6 | vs | 137.1 | Around 30% better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2012) score | |||
| Quieter idle noise level | 40 dB | vs | 40.8 dB | Almost the same | |||
| Better CLBenchmark raytrace score | 132,987 | vs | 87,206 | More than 50% better CLBenchmark raytrace score | |||
| Better SmallLuxGPU 2.0d4 score | 6,800 | vs | 3,400 | 2x better SmallLuxGPU 2.0d4 score | |||
| Wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 192 bit | Around 35% wider memory bus | |||
| Higher civilization 5 framerate | 66.1 fps | vs | 54.1 fps | More than 20% higher civilization 5 framerate | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs 560 Ti
Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | by techPowerUp! (Mar, 2013)3DMark 11, as the name might suggest, makes use of the Microsoft DirectX 11 API and puts every feature of it to use, creating astonishingly realistic visuals.
3DMark Vantage (Texture Fill) Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX performance
3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance
Crysis: Warhead (2013) 1920x1080 - Enthusiast Quality + 4xAA
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | by techPowerUp! (Mar, 2013)Unfortunately, it leaves a less than satisfactory impression, which makes it a candidate that surpasses Crysis for highest hardware requirements.
Batman: Arkham City 1920x1200 - Extreme quality + FXAA-HIGH
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | by techPowerUp! (Mar, 2013)endeavour. Batman: Arkham City uses the same Unreal Engine by Epic as Batman: Arkham Asylum, but it has, thanks to the engine's modularity, been overhauled and equipped with the latest technologies, including a graphics engine that takes advantage of DirectX 11.
SmallLux GPU 2.0d4 Measures compute performance using OpenCL to do 3D rendering
Reviews Word on the street
| GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | vs | 560 Ti | ||
 | GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
Read more
Comments
Showing 4 comments.
