Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Axigon GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 1,006 MHz vs 450 MHz Around 2.2x higher clock speed
Better floating-point performance 1,545.2 GFLOPS vs 17.6 GFLOPS More than 87.8x better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 64.4 GTexel/s vs 3.6 GTexel/s Around 18x higher texture rate
Higher pixel rate 16.1 GPixel/s vs 1.8 GPixel/s Around 9x higher pixel rate
More texture mapping units 64 vs 8 56 more texture mapping units
More shading units 768 vs 8 760 more shading units
More render output processors 16 vs 4 12 more render output processors
Front view of GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel

Reasons to consider the
Intel GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel

Report a correction
Significantly lower TDP 12W vs 110W 9.2x lower TDP

Features Key features of the GeForce GTX 650 Ti  vs 9100M G mGPU Intel 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

GeForce GTX 650 Ti
16.1 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

GeForce GTX 650 Ti
64.4 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

GeForce GTX 650 Ti
1,545.2 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers

Specifications Full list of technical specs


GeForce GTX 650 Ti  vs
9100M G mGPU Intel 
GPU brand Nvidia Nvidia
GPU name GK106 MCP79MX
Clock speed 1,006 MHz 450 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti 928 MHz 1 GB None

noise and power

TDP 110W 12W

raw performance

GeForce GTX 650 Ti  vs
9100M G mGPU Intel 
Shading units 768 8
Texture mapping units 64 8
Render output processors 16 4
Pixel rate 16.1 GPixel/s 1.8 GPixel/s
Texture rate 64.4 GTexel/s 3.6 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 1,545.2 GFLOPS 17.6 GFLOPS


comments powered by Disqus