GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 650 Ti vs GTS 450


Real world tests using the latest 3D games

crysis: warhead (2013), Crysis: Warhead (2012), Batman: Arkham City and 6 more


Synthetic tests to measure overall performance

3DMark Vantage Texture Fill, 3DMark 11 Graphics, 3DMark Vantage Graphics and 1 more

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

CLBenchmark Raytrace

Noise and Power

How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load

TDP, Idle Noise Level, Load Noise Level, Idle Power Consumption and 1 more

GPUBoss Score

Gaming, Benchmarks, Compute Performance and Noise and Power

Axigon GeForce GTX 650 Ti 

GPUBoss recommends the Axigon GeForce GTX 650 Ti  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Axigon GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 15,630 vs 1,887.5 More than 8.2x better 3DMark06 score
Significantly higher clock speed 1,006 MHz vs 783 MHz Around 30% higher clock speed
Much better manhattan score 3,709.4 vs 1,383.79 Around 2.8x better manhattan score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 17,120 vs 8,551 More than 2x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Higher effective memory clock speed 5,400 MHz vs 3,608 MHz Around 50% higher effective memory clock speed
Better 3DMark vantage texture fill score 46.1 vs 21.9 More than 2x better 3DMark vantage texture fill score
Much better T-Rex score 3,355.01 vs 1,395.23 Around 2.5x better T-Rex score
Better floating-point performance 1,545 GFLOPS vs 601.3 GFLOPS More than 2.5x better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 64.4 GTexel/s vs 25.1 GTexel/s More than 2.5x higher texture rate
Higher pixel rate 16.1 GPixel/s vs 6.26 GPixel/s More than 2.5x higher pixel rate
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,350 MHz vs 902 MHz Around 50% higher memory clock speed
More shading units 768 vs 192 576 more shading units
More energy-efficient idle power consumption 107W vs 111W Around 5% more energy-efficient idle power consumption
More texture mapping units 64 vs 32 Twice as many texture mapping units
Better CLBenchmark raytrace score 71,438 vs 40,494 More than 75% better CLBenchmark raytrace score
Front view of GeForce GTS 450

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450

Report a correction
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 16,033.5 vs 4,740 Around 3.5x better 3DMark 11 graphics score

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs GTS 450

3DMark Vantage (Texture Fill) Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX performance

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining)

GeForce GTX 650 Ti
49.81 mHash/s
GeForce GTS 450
44.61 mHash/s

GFXBench 3.0 (T-Rex)

GFXBench 3.0 (Manhattan)

CLBenchmark Raytrace Measures compute performance using OpenCL to do raytracing

Reviews Word on the street

GeForce GTX 650 Ti  vs GTS 450 

In this review, we're taking a close look at the ASUS GeForce GTX 650 Ti DirectCU II TOP: a premium factory-overclocked model that combines ASUS's workhorse performance-segment cooler, the 2-slot DirectCU II, with a custom-design PCB.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti


comments powered by Disqus