GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs 285 Mac |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher effective memory clock speed | 5,400 MHz | vs | 2,484 MHz | Around 2.2x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly higher clock speed | 1,006 MHz | vs | 648 MHz | More than 55% higher clock speed | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 1,545.2 GFLOPS | vs | 708.5 GFLOPS | Around 2.2x better floating-point performance | |||
| More shading units | 768 | vs | 240 | 528 more shading units | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,350 MHz | vs | 1,242 MHz | Around 10% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly lower TDP | 110W | vs | 204W | More than 45% lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly higher memory bandwidth | 159 GB/s | vs | 86.4 GB/s | Around 85% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Much wider memory bus | 512 bit | vs | 128 bit | 4x wider memory bus | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| More texture mapping units | 80 | vs | 64 | 16 more texture mapping units | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs 285 Mac
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu | GeForce GTX 650 Ti | vs | 285 Mac |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPU brand | Nvidia | Nvidia | |
| GPU name | GK106 | GT200 B3 | |
| Market | Desktop | Desktop | |
| Clock speed | 1,006 MHz | 648 MHz | |
| Is dual GPU | No | No | |
| Reference card | Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti 928 MHz 1 GB | None | |
raw performance | |||
| Shading units | 768 | 240 | |
| Texture mapping units | 64 | 80 | |
| Render output processors | 16 | 32 | |
| Pixel rate | 16.1 GPixel/s | 20.74 GPixel/s | |
| Texture rate | 64.4 GTexel/s | 51.84 GTexel/s | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,545.2 GFLOPS | 708.5 GFLOPS | |
memory | GeForce GTX 650 Ti | vs | 285 Mac |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memory clock speed | 1,350 MHz | 1,242 MHz | |
| Effective memory clock speed | 5,400 MHz | 2,484 MHz | |
| Memory bus | 128 bit | 512 bit | |
| Memory | 1,024 MB | 1,024 MB | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | 159 GB/s | |
noise and power | |||
| TDP | 110W | 204W | |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $274 | ||
| 650 Ti vs 750 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 650 Ti vs 750 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 650 Ti vs 7770 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 650 Ti vs R7 260X | ||
| | VS |  |
| 650 Ti vs 650 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 650 Ti vs 7790 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 650 Ti vs 550 Ti | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $280 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 390 | ||
