GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 650 Ti vs 550 Ti

Gaming

Real world tests using the latest 3D games

crysis: warhead (2013), Crysis: Warhead (2012), Batman: Arkham City and 6 more

Benchmarks

Synthetic tests to measure overall performance

3DMark Vantage Texture Fill, 3DMark 11 Graphics, 3DMark Vantage Graphics and 1 more

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

CLBenchmark Raytrace

Noise and Power

How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load

TDP, Idle Noise Level, Load Noise Level, Idle Power Consumption and 1 more

GPUBoss Score

Gaming, Benchmarks, Compute Performance and Noise and Power

Winner
Axigon GeForce GTX 650 Ti 

GPUBoss recommends the Axigon GeForce GTX 650 Ti  based on its benchmarks, compute performance and noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Axigon GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 15,630 vs 2,272 Around 7x better 3DMark06 score
Higher clock speed 1,006 MHz vs 900 MHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 17,120 vs 9,923 Around 75% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Higher effective memory clock speed 5,400 MHz vs 4,104 MHz More than 30% higher effective memory clock speed
Better 3DMark vantage texture fill score 46.1 vs 25.24 Around 85% better 3DMark vantage texture fill score
Better floating-point performance 1,545 GFLOPS vs 691.2 GFLOPS Around 2.2x better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 64.4 GTexel/s vs 28.8 GTexel/s Around 2.2x higher texture rate
More energy-efficient idle power consumption 107W vs 114W More than 5% more energy-efficient idle power consumption
Slightly higher pixel rate 16.1 GPixel/s vs 7.2 GPixel/s Around 2.2x higher pixel rate
More shading units 768 vs 192 576 more shading units
Higher memory clock speed 1,350 MHz vs 1,026 MHz More than 30% higher memory clock speed
Better manhattan score 3,709.4 vs 3,539.52 Around 5% better manhattan score
Slightly more energy-efficient load power consumption 261W vs 286W Around 10% more energy-efficient load power consumption
More texture mapping units 64 vs 32 Twice as many texture mapping units
Higher battlefield 3 framerate 58 fps vs 31.4 fps Around 85% higher battlefield 3 framerate
Higher crysis: warhead framerate 25.3 fps vs 17.7 fps Around 45% higher crysis: warhead framerate
Slightly better CLBenchmark raytrace score 71,438 vs 48,088 Around 50% better CLBenchmark raytrace score
Front view of GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Report a correction
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 15,553 vs 4,740 More than 3.2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Slightly more render output processors 24 vs 16 8 more render output processors

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs 550 Ti

3DMark Vantage (Texture Fill) Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX performance

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining)

GeForce GTX 650 Ti
49.81 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 550 Ti
44.8 mHash/s

GFXBench 3.0 (T-Rex)

GFXBench 3.0 (Manhattan)

CLBenchmark Raytrace Measures compute performance using OpenCL to do raytracing

Reviews Word on the street

GeForce GTX 650 Ti  vs 550 Ti 

9.1
8.8
In this review, we're taking a close look at the ASUS GeForce GTX 650 Ti DirectCU II TOP: a premium factory-overclocked model that combines ASUS's workhorse performance-segment cooler, the 2-slot DirectCU II, with a custom-design PCB.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Comments

comments powered by Disqus