GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 650 Ti vs 650 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.8

Overall Score

Winner
Colorful GeForce GTX 650 

GPUBoss recommends the Colorful GeForce GTX 650  based on its noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Axigon GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Report a correction
Better floating-point performance 1,545.2 GFLOPS vs 812.5 GFLOPS More than 90% better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 64.4 GTexel/s vs 33.9 GTexel/s Around 90% higher texture rate
Higher effective memory clock speed 5,400 MHz vs 5,000 MHz Around 10% higher effective memory clock speed
More texture mapping units 64 vs 32 Twice as many texture mapping units
Slightly higher pixel rate 16.1 GPixel/s vs 8.46 GPixel/s More than 90% higher pixel rate
More shading units 768 vs 384 Twice as many shading units
Better fire strike factor score 24.78 vs 17.21 Around 45% better fire strike factor score
Higher memory clock speed 1,350 MHz vs 1,250 MHz Around 10% higher memory clock speed
Front view of GeForce GTX 650

Reasons to consider the
Colorful GeForce GTX 650

Report a correction
Lower TDP 65W vs 110W More than 40% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs 650

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Reviews Word on the street

Read more

Comments

Showing 2 comments.
Mostly agree, but some "peak-loads" may require power way beyond 75W or "pin free level". Even if their regular consumption levels to be around 60w (without the need of pinny power cable). Around the internet, It could be seen from anonymus test charts that, EXAMPLE: "HD 4850 consumes ~130 at idle time, ~180 at peak load" However, the manufacturer says "TDP: 110W for HD 4850"! Well you are right about "lie" or "mistake" a bit. Still not exacty. We don't know under what circumstances that TDP are calculated, and what exactly they mean. Its always better to think "around roughly". (I bet they calculate it under too ideal systems, to both not lie and to not show it more than a extreme possible, and still NEED TO GIVE ONE NUMBER) Sincerely.
That is weird because according to Nvidia the Regular GTX 650 has 16.92 Gpixels Yet this site shows it has only 8.46 Gpixels,
comments powered by Disqus