GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 650 vs 530 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

5.7

Overall Score

Winner
Colorful GeForce GTX 650 

GPUBoss recommends the Colorful GeForce GTX 650  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 650

Reasons to consider the
Colorful GeForce GTX 650

Report a correction
Much higher effective memory clock speed 5,000 MHz vs 1,800 MHz More than 2.8x higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly higher clock speed 1,058 MHz vs 700 MHz More than 50% higher clock speed
Better 3DMark06 score 13,180 vs 8,490 More than 55% better 3DMark06 score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 11,600 vs 3,770 More than 3x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Better PassMark score 1,831 vs 743 Around 2.5x better PassMark score
Higher memory bandwidth 80 GB/s vs 28.8 GB/s More than 2.8x higher memory bandwidth
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 2,870 vs 990 Around 3x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Significantly better sky diver factor score 151.81 vs 65.37 More than 2.2x better sky diver factor score
Better floating-point performance 812.5 GFLOPS vs 268.8 GFLOPS More than 3x better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 33.9 GTexel/s vs 11.2 GTexel/s More than 3x higher texture rate
More render output processors 16 vs 4 12 more render output processors
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,250 MHz vs 900 MHz Around 40% higher memory clock speed
More shading units 384 vs 96 288 more shading units
More texture mapping units 32 vs 16 Twice as many texture mapping units
Better manhattan score 3,493.04 vs 1,704.19 More than 2x better manhattan score
Better PassMark direct compute score 813 vs 367 Around 2.2x better PassMark direct compute score
Front view of GeForce GT 530

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 530

Report a correction
Slightly lower TDP 50W vs 65W Around 25% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 650 vs GT 530

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 650
23.48 mHash/s
GeForce GT 530
17.55 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 650
14.09 mPixels/s
GeForce GT 530
6.71 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 650
455.37 frames/s
GeForce GT 530
141.02 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 650
3,352.38
GeForce GT 530
2,889.02

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 650
3,493.04
GeForce GT 530
1,704.19

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus