GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 650 vs 610

Gaming

Real world tests using the latest 3D games

crysis: warhead (2013), Crysis: Warhead (2012), Batman: Arkham City and 6 more

Benchmarks

Synthetic tests to measure overall performance

Passmark, 3DMark 11 Graphics, 3DMark Vantage Graphics and 3DMark06

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

Passmark Direct Compute and CLBenchmark Raytrace

Noise and Power

How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load

TDP

GPUBoss Score

Gaming, Benchmarks, Compute Performance and Noise and Power

Winner
Colorful GeForce GTX 650 

GPUBoss recommends the Colorful GeForce GTX 650  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 650

Reasons to consider the
Colorful GeForce GTX 650

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 1,058 MHz vs 810 MHz More than 30% higher clock speed
Much higher effective memory clock speed 5,000 MHz vs 1,200 MHz Around 4.2x higher effective memory clock speed
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 11,600 vs 1,820 More than 6.2x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Better 3DMark06 score 13,180 vs 3,910 More than 3.2x better 3DMark06 score
Better passmark score 1,838 vs 352 Around 5.2x better passmark score
Higher memory bandwidth 80 GB/s vs 9.6 GB/s More than 8.2x higher memory bandwidth
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 2,870 vs 560 Around 5.2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Much higher memory clock speed 1,250 MHz vs 600 MHz More than 2x higher memory clock speed
Better floating-point performance 812.5 GFLOPS vs 155.5 GFLOPS Around 5.2x better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 33.9 GTexel/s vs 6.48 GTexel/s Around 5.2x higher texture rate
Higher pixel rate 8.46 GPixel/s vs 1.62 GPixel/s Around 5.2x higher pixel rate
More render output processors 16 vs 4 12 more render output processors
More shading units 384 vs 48 336 more shading units
More texture mapping units 32 vs 8 24 more texture mapping units
Better passmark direct compute score 818 vs 204 More than 4x better passmark direct compute score
Better CLBenchmark raytrace score 39,594 vs 8,914 Around 4.5x better CLBenchmark raytrace score
Wider memory bus 128 bit vs 64 bit 2x wider memory bus
Front view of GeForce GT 610

Reasons to consider the
ASUS GeForce GT 610

Report a correction
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Lower TDP 29W vs 65W 2.2x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 650 vs GT 610

Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance

3DMark 11, as the name might suggest, makes use of the Microsoft DirectX 11 API and puts every feature of it to use, creating astonishingly realistic visuals.
GeForce GTX 650 | by techPowerUp! (Mar, 2013)

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

GeForce GTX 650 GeForce GT 610 @ community.futuremark.com

3DMark Vantage Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 10 GPU performance

GeForce GTX 650 GeForce GT 610 @ community.futuremark.com

3DMark06 Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 9 GPU performance

GeForce GTX 650 GeForce GT 610 @ community.futuremark.com

Passmark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

CLBenchmark Raytrace Measures compute performance using OpenCL to do raytracing

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus