GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 650 vs 620 among Desktop GPUs


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more


Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more


Overall Score

Colorful GeForce GTX 650 

GPUBoss recommends the Colorful GeForce GTX 650  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 650

Reasons to consider the
Colorful GeForce GTX 650

Report a correction
Much higher effective memory clock speed 5,000 MHz vs 1,796 MHz More than 2.8x higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly better 3DMark06 score 13,180 vs 4,730 More than 2.8x better 3DMark06 score
Higher clock speed 1,058 MHz vs 810 MHz More than 30% higher clock speed
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 11,600 vs 2,230 Around 5.2x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Better PassMark score 1,831 vs 432 Around 4.2x better PassMark score
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 80 GB/s vs 14.37 GB/s More than 5.5x higher memory bandwidth
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 2,870 vs 750 More than 3.8x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Significantly better sky diver factor score 151.81 vs 50.4 More than 3x better sky diver factor score
Better floating-point performance 812.5 GFLOPS vs 155.52 GFLOPS Around 5.2x better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 33.9 GTexel/s vs 6.48 GTexel/s Around 5.2x higher texture rate
More render output processors 16 vs 4 12 more render output processors
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,250 MHz vs 898 MHz Around 40% higher memory clock speed
More texture mapping units 32 vs 8 24 more texture mapping units
Slightly higher pixel rate 8.46 GPixel/s vs 1.62 GPixel/s Around 5.2x higher pixel rate
More shading units 384 vs 48 336 more shading units
Better manhattan score 3,493.04 vs 1,103 Around 3.2x better manhattan score
Better T-Rex score 1.01 frames/s vs 0 frames/s Compared to all graphics cards, 1.01 frames/s T-Rex score is just OK
Wider memory bus 128 bit vs 64 bit 2x wider memory bus
Better PassMark direct compute score 813 vs 271 3x better PassMark direct compute score
Front view of GeForce GT 620

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 620

Report a correction
Lower TDP 30W vs 65W 2.2x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 650 vs GT 620

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 650
23.48 mHash/s
GeForce GT 620
17.41 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 650
14.09 mPixels/s
GeForce GT 620
2.76 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 650
455.37 frames/s
GeForce GT 620
83.91 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 650
GeForce GT 620

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Read more


comments powered by Disqus