GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 650 vs 260

Gaming

Real world tests using the latest 3D games

Crysis: Warhead (2012)

Benchmarks

Synthetic tests to measure overall performance

Passmark and 3DMark Vantage Texture Fill

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

SmallLuxGPU 2.0d4

Noise and Power

How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load

TDP, Idle Noise Level, Load Noise Level, Idle Power Consumption and 1 more

GPUBoss Score

Gaming, Benchmarks, Compute Performance and Noise and Power

Winner
Colorful GeForce GTX 650 

GPUBoss recommends the Colorful GeForce GTX 650  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 650

Reasons to consider the
Colorful GeForce GTX 650

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 1,058 MHz vs 576 MHz Around 85% higher clock speed
Much higher effective memory clock speed 5,000 MHz vs 1,998 MHz More than 2.5x higher effective memory clock speed
Much more energy-efficient idle power consumption 104W vs 139W More than 25% more energy-efficient idle power consumption
Better passmark score 1,837 vs 1,121 Around 65% better passmark score
More energy-efficient load power consumption 231W vs 295W More than 20% more energy-efficient load power consumption
Significantly quieter load noise level 43.5 dB vs 49.1 dB More than 10% quieter load noise level
Quieter idle noise level 43 dB vs 45 dB Around 5% quieter idle noise level
Higher memory clock speed 1,250 MHz vs 999 MHz More than 25% higher memory clock speed
Lower TDP 65W vs 182W 2.8x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 260

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260

Report a correction
Significantly wider memory bus 448 bit vs 128 bit 3.5x wider memory bus
Slightly higher memory bandwidth 111.9 GB/s vs 80 GB/s Around 40% higher memory bandwidth
Higher pixel rate 16.1 GPixel/s vs 8.46 GPixel/s More than 90% higher pixel rate
More render output processors 28 vs 16 12 more render output processors
More texture mapping units 64 vs 32 Twice as many texture mapping units

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 650 vs 260

Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance

3DMark 11, as the name might suggest, makes use of the Microsoft DirectX 11 API and puts every feature of it to use, creating astonishingly realistic visuals.
GeForce GTX 650 | by techPowerUp! (Mar, 2013)

3DMark Vantage (Texture Fill) Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX performance

Crysis: Warhead (2012) 1920x1200 - Frost Bench - Enthusiast Quality + 4xAA

GeForce GTX 650
17.8 fps
GeForce GTX 260
17.2 fps
Unfortunately, it leaves a less than satisfactory impression, which makes it a candidate that surpasses Crysis for highest hardware requirements.
GeForce GTX 650 | by techPowerUp! (Mar, 2013)

SmallLux GPU 2.0d4 Measures compute performance using OpenCL to do 3D rendering

Reviews Word on the street

GeForce GTX 650  vs 260 

8.6
9.2
NVIDIA's HDMI Audio design requires you to feed an audio signal to the card so it can be added to the HDMI Video stream from the card.
GeForce GTX 260

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus