Winner
MSI GeForce GTX 560 Ti
GPUBoss recommends the MSI GeForce GTX 560 Ti based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX 650 vs 560 Ti |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 650 vs 560 Ti among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 5.7 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 1,058 MHz | vs | 950 MHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 5,000 MHz | vs | 4,200 MHz | Around 20% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher battlefield 3 framerate | 70 | vs | 52.5 | Around 35% higher battlefield 3 framerate | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,250 MHz | vs | 1,050 MHz | Around 20% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly lower TDP | 65W | vs | 170W | 2.6x lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| Much higher battlefield 3 framerate | 57.3 fps | vs | 34 fps | Around 70% higher battlefield 3 framerate | |||
| Better PassMark score | 3,538 | vs | 1,831 | Around 95% better PassMark score | |||
| Better 3DMark06 score | 16,518 | vs | 13,180 | More than 25% better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 134.4 GB/s | vs | 80 GB/s | Around 70% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 17,648 | vs | 11,600 | More than 50% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 1,459.2 GFLOPS | vs | 812.5 GFLOPS | Around 80% better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher texture rate | 60.8 GTexel/s | vs | 33.9 GTexel/s | Around 80% higher texture rate | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Better sky diver factor score | 227.23 | vs | 151.81 | Around 50% better sky diver factor score | |||
| More texture mapping units | 64 | vs | 32 | Twice as many texture mapping units | |||
| Wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 128 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
| Slightly higher pixel rate | 15.2 GPixel/s | vs | 8.46 GPixel/s | Around 80% higher pixel rate | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 1,437 | vs | 813 | More than 75% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 650 vs 560 Ti
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Bioshock Infinite
FarCry 3
Reviews Word on the street
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $274 | ||
| 560 Ti vs 750 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 560 Ti vs 760 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $98 | ||
| 650 vs 730 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 650 vs 7770 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 650 vs 550 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 650 vs 750 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 650 vs 740 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS |  |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 960 vs R9 380 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 390 | ||
| | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| 750 Ti vs 960 | ||
