Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs 1050 Ti |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 660 Ti vs 1050 Ti among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 7 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 TiGPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| More texture mapping units | 112 | vs | 48 | 64 more texture mapping units | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher memory bandwidth | 144.2 GB/s | vs | 112.1 GB/s | Around 30% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Higher texture rate | 102.5 GTexel/s | vs | 62 GTexel/s | More than 65% higher texture rate | |||
| More shading units | 1,344 | vs | 768 | 576 more shading units | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 1,291 MHz | vs | 915 MHz | More than 40% higher clock speed | |||
| Better PassMark score | 5,757 | vs | 4,686 | Around 25% better PassMark score | |||
| More memory | 4,096 MB | vs | 2,048 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 1,392 MHz | vs | 980 MHz | More than 40% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 7,008 MHz | vs | 6,008 MHz | More than 15% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 41.3 GPixel/s | vs | 25.62 GPixel/s | More than 60% higher pixel rate | |||
| Better video composition score | 75.17 frames/s | vs | 48.33 frames/s | More than 55% better video composition score | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 24 | 8 more render output processors | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,752 MHz | vs | 1,502 MHz | More than 15% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 3,271 | vs | 2,546 | Around 30% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Lower TDP | 75W | vs | 150W | 2x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
