Winner
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
GPUBoss recommends the GeForce GTX 660 Ti based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details | GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs 660 |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Value | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
6.5 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
Generic GeForce GTX 660 TiGPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
| |||||||
Better 3DMark06 score | 22,997 | vs | 18,060 | More than 25% better 3DMark06 score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher clock speed | 915 MHz | vs | 823 MHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
Slightly better PassMark score | 4,686 | vs | 4,121 | Around 15% better PassMark score | |||
Slightly better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 8,415 | vs | 6,850 | Around 25% better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
Slightly better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 27,687 | vs | 25,130 | More than 10% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
Higher effective memory clock speed | 6,008 MHz | vs | 5,600 MHz | More than 5% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Better floating-point performance | 2,459.5 GFLOPS | vs | 1,896.2 GFLOPS | Around 30% better floating-point performance | |||
Higher texture rate | 102.5 GTexel/s | vs | 79 GTexel/s | Around 30% higher texture rate | |||
More texture mapping units | 112 | vs | 96 | 16 more texture mapping units | |||
Higher turbo clock speed | 980 MHz | vs | 888 MHz | More than 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Slightly more shading units | 1,344 | vs | 1,152 | 192 more shading units | |||
Better PassMark direct compute score | 2,546 | vs | 1,948 | More than 30% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
Higher memory clock speed | 1,502 MHz | vs | 1,400 MHz | More than 5% higher memory clock speed | |||
| |||||||
Higher memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | vs | 144.2 GB/s | Around 25% higher memory bandwidth | |||
Significantly better manhattan score | 12,983.16 | vs | 3,711.8 | Around 3.5x better manhattan score | |||
Significantly higher FarCry 3 framerate | 80 | vs | 54 | Around 50% higher FarCry 3 framerate | |||
More render output processors | 32 | vs | 24 | 8 more render output processors | |||
Wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 192 bit | Around 35% wider memory bus | |||
Slightly lower TDP | 130W | vs | 150W | Around 15% lower TDP |
GeForce GTX 660 Ti | vs | 660 | ||
![]() | 9.5 | 9.0 |
---|
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | $274 | |
660 vs 750 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | ||
660 vs 1050 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | ||
660 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | ||
660 vs 940MX | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
660 Ti vs 760 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
660 Ti vs 750 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
660 Ti vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
970 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs R9 380 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs R9 390 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R9 290X vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
750 Ti vs 960 | ||