Winner
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
GPUBoss recommends the GeForce GTX 660 Ti based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs 660 |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 660 Ti vs 660 among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.5 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Generic GeForce GTX 660 TiGPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Better 3DMark06 score | 22,997 | vs | 18,060 | More than 25% better 3DMark06 score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher clock speed | 915 MHz | vs | 823 MHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
| Slightly better PassMark score | 4,686 | vs | 4,121 | Around 15% better PassMark score | |||
| Slightly better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 8,415 | vs | 6,850 | Around 25% better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
| Slightly better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 27,687 | vs | 25,130 | More than 10% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 6,008 MHz | vs | 5,600 MHz | More than 5% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 2,459.5 GFLOPS | vs | 1,896.2 GFLOPS | Around 30% better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher texture rate | 102.5 GTexel/s | vs | 79 GTexel/s | Around 30% higher texture rate | |||
| More texture mapping units | 112 | vs | 96 | 16 more texture mapping units | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 980 MHz | vs | 888 MHz | More than 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Slightly more shading units | 1,344 | vs | 1,152 | 192 more shading units | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 2,546 | vs | 1,948 | More than 30% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,502 MHz | vs | 1,400 MHz | More than 5% higher memory clock speed | |||
| |||||||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | vs | 144.2 GB/s | Around 25% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Significantly better manhattan score | 12,983.16 | vs | 3,711.8 | Around 3.5x better manhattan score | |||
| Significantly higher FarCry 3 framerate | 80 | vs | 54 | Around 50% higher FarCry 3 framerate | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 24 | 8 more render output processors | |||
| Wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 192 bit | Around 35% wider memory bus | |||
| Slightly lower TDP | 130W | vs | 150W | Around 15% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs 660
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Thief
Bioshock Infinite
Reviews Word on the street
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $200 | $274 | |
| 660 vs 750 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | ||
| 660 vs 1050 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | ||
| 660 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | ||
| 660 vs 940MX | ||
 | VS |  |
| 660 Ti vs 760 | ||
| | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| 660 Ti vs 750 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 660 Ti vs 960 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 960 vs R9 380 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 390 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 290X vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| 750 Ti vs 960 | ||
