GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs 660 |
Released August, 2012
Generic GeForce GTX 660 Ti
- 915 MHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
7.4 Out of 10
by techPowerUp! (Aug, 2012)By genre, TES: Skyrim is a role-playing game - it combines some of the best elements of older titles in the franchise with some new sandbox elements to churn out an extremely engaging and addictive game.
VS
Released September, 2012
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
- 980 MHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
7.2 Out of 10
by techPowerUp! (Sep, 2012)Its clocks are essentially those of NVIDIA's reference design with a tiny 13 MHz bump.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 660 Ti vs 660
Gaming | |
Real world tests using the latest 3D games | |
| crysis: warhead (2013), Crysis: Warhead (2012), Batman: Arkham City and 4 more | |
Benchmarks | |
Synthetic tests to measure overall performance | |
| Passmark and 3DMark Vantage Texture Fill | |
Compute Performance | |
General computing tests executed on the GPU | |
| SmallLuxGPU 2.0d4, Civilization 5 Texture Decomposition (2013) and 2 more | |
Noise and Power | |
How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load | |
| TDP, Idle Noise Level, Load Noise Level, Idle Power Consumption and 1 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Better 3DMark vantage texture fill score | 86.4 | vs | 65.3 | More than 30% better 3DMark vantage texture fill score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slightly better floating-point performance | 2,460 GFLOPS | vs | 1,882 GFLOPS | More than 30% better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher texture rate | 102.5 GTexel/s | vs | 78.4 GTexel/s | More than 30% higher texture rate | |||
| Slightly higher pixel rate | 25.6 GPixel/s | vs | 19.6 GPixel/s | More than 30% higher pixel rate | |||
| More texture mapping units | 112 | vs | 80 | 32 more texture mapping units | |||
| More shading units | 1,344 | vs | 960 | 384 more shading units | |||
| Higher civilization 5 framerate | 86.6 fps | vs | 72.2 fps | Around 20% higher civilization 5 framerate | |||
| Higher battlefield 3 framerate | 96.9 fps | vs | 82.5 fps | More than 15% higher battlefield 3 framerate | |||
| Higher far cry 3 framerate | 37.3 fps | vs | 32 fps | More than 15% higher far cry 3 framerate | |||
| Better passmark direct compute score | 2,519 | vs | 1,906 | More than 30% better passmark direct compute score | |||
| More SMX units | 7 | vs | 5 | 2 more SMX units | |||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 980 MHz | vs | 915 MHz | More than 5% higher clock speed | |||
| Slightly more energy-efficient load power consumption | 296W | vs | 318W | More than 5% more energy-efficient load power consumption | |||
| Quieter idle noise level | 40.8 dB | vs | 41.8 dB | Almost the same | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 1,032 MHz | vs | 980 MHz | More than 5% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs 660
Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance
3DMark Vantage (Texture Fill) Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX performance
Crysis: Warhead (2013) 1920x1080 - Enthusiast Quality + 4xAA
Batman: Arkham City 1920x1200 - Extreme quality + FXAA-HIGH
Far Cry 3 1920 x 1080 - Ultra Quality + 4x MSAA + Enh. AtoC
SmallLux GPU 2.0d4 Measures compute performance using OpenCL to do 3D rendering
Reviews Word on the street
| GeForce GTX 660 Ti | vs | 660 | ||
 | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 660 vs 750 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 660 vs 760 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 660 vs R9 270X | ||
| | VS |  |
| 660 vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 660 vs 750 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 660 vs R9 270 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 660 vs 970 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS | |
| R9 290X vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs 980 | ||
 | VS | |
| 780 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 760 vs 960 | ||
 | VS | |
| 770 vs 970 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 290 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 760 vs R9 270X | ||
