GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 660 vs 610M among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.9

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 660  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 660

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 18,060 vs 507.5 More than 35.5x better 3DMark06 score
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 25,130 vs 1,930 More than 13x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Significantly better PassMark score 4,121 vs 399 More than 10.2x better PassMark score
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 5,600 MHz vs 1,600 MHz 3.5x higher effective memory clock speed
Much better CLBenchmark raytrace score 95,174 vs 9,976 More than 9.5x better CLBenchmark raytrace score
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 179.2 GB/s vs 12.8 GB/s Around 14x higher memory bandwidth
Higher clock speed 823 MHz vs 672 MHz More than 20% higher clock speed
Better floating-point performance 1,896.2 GFLOPS vs 129.02 GFLOPS Around 14.8x better floating-point performance
Much better manhattan score 12,983.16 vs 1,308.32 Around 10x better manhattan score
Much better fire strike factor score 44.27 vs 4.91 More than 9x better fire strike factor score
Higher texture rate 79 GTexel/s vs 5.38 GTexel/s Around 14.8x higher texture rate
Significantly more render output processors 32 vs 2 30 more render output processors
Significantly more texture mapping units 96 vs 8 88 more texture mapping units
Slightly better 3DMark 11 graphics score 6,850 vs 4,598 Around 50% better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher pixel rate 19.75 GPixel/s vs 1.34 GPixel/s Around 14.8x higher pixel rate
More shading units 1,152 vs 48 1104 more shading units
Slightly more memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,400 MHz vs 800 MHz 75% higher memory clock speed
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,948 vs 205 More than 9.5x better PassMark direct compute score
Better face detection score 30.41 mPixels/s vs 2.75 mPixels/s More than 11x better face detection score
Wider memory bus 256 bit vs 64 bit 4x wider memory bus
Front view of GeForce 610M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 610M

Report a correction
Significantly lower TDP 12W vs 130W 10.8x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 660 vs 610M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
67.94 mHash/s
GeForce 610M
9.69 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
30.41 mPixels/s
GeForce 610M
2.75 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
706.33 frames/s
GeForce 610M
110.21 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
19,695.95
GeForce 610M
2,064.48

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
12,983.16
GeForce 610M
1,308.32

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus