Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX 660 vs 920MX |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 660 vs 920MX among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.9 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660GPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Better PassMark score | 4,121 | vs | 986 | Around 4.2x better PassMark score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly higher effective memory clock speed | 5,600 MHz | vs | 1,800 MHz | More than 3x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | vs | 14.4 GB/s | Around 12.5x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Significantly better manhattan score | 12,983.16 | vs | 3,246.38 | Around 4x better manhattan score | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 1,896.2 GFLOPS | vs | 548.9 GFLOPS | Around 3.5x better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher texture rate | 79 GTexel/s | vs | 25.73 GTexel/s | More than 3x higher texture rate | |||
| More texture mapping units | 96 | vs | 24 | 72 more texture mapping units | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 8 | 24 more render output processors | |||
| More shading units | 1,152 | vs | 256 | 896 more shading units | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 19.75 GPixel/s | vs | 8.58 GPixel/s | More than 2.2x higher pixel rate | |||
| Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,400 MHz | vs | 900 MHz | More than 55% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher bioshock infinite framerate | 57 | vs | 12.1 | Around 4.8x higher bioshock infinite framerate | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 1,948 | vs | 716 | Around 2.8x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 64 bit | 4x wider memory bus | |||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 1,072 MHz | vs | 823 MHz | More than 30% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 1,176 MHz | vs | 888 MHz | More than 30% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Significantly lower TDP | 16W | vs | 130W | 8.1x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 660 vs 920MX
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Bioshock Infinite
PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $200 | ||
| 660 vs 940MX | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | ||
| 660 vs 1050 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | ||
| 660 vs 940M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | ||
| 660 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | $98 | |
| 660 vs 730 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | $274 | |
| 660 vs 750 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | ||
| 660 vs 920M | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
| | VS | |
| $267 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $267 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 390 | ||
