Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX 660 vs 920MX |
Released August, 2012
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
- 823 MHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
6.9 Out of 10
by techPowerUp! (Sep, 2012)The game graphics are, even today, top notch, yet the game still runs well on most computers.
VS
Released March, 2016
Nvidia GeForce 920MX
- 1.1 GHz
- 2 GB DDR3
5.9 Out of 10
by hassan-mujtaba (May, 2014)Performance figures a re not known but it is mentioned that the MX100 SSDs will feature very competitive price points which is a good sign in the SSD market since costs are going down and SSDs become the choice for storage globally due to the attractive prices.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 660 vs 920MX among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.9 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better manhattan score | 12,983.16 | vs | 3,246.38 | Around 4x better manhattan score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better PassMark score | 4,121 | vs | 986 | Around 4.2x better PassMark score | |||
| Significantly higher effective memory clock speed | 5,600 MHz | vs | 1,800 MHz | More than 3x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | vs | 14.4 GB/s | Around 12.5x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 1,896.2 GFLOPS | vs | 548.9 GFLOPS | Around 3.5x better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher texture rate | 79 GTexel/s | vs | 25.73 GTexel/s | More than 3x higher texture rate | |||
| More texture mapping units | 96 | vs | 24 | 72 more texture mapping units | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 8 | 24 more render output processors | |||
| More shading units | 1,152 | vs | 256 | 896 more shading units | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 19.75 GPixel/s | vs | 8.58 GPixel/s | More than 2.2x higher pixel rate | |||
| Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,400 MHz | vs | 900 MHz | More than 55% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher bioshock infinite framerate | 57 | vs | 12.1 | Around 4.8x higher bioshock infinite framerate | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 1,948 | vs | 716 | Around 2.8x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 64 bit | 4x wider memory bus | |||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 1,072 MHz | vs | 823 MHz | More than 30% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 1,176 MHz | vs | 888 MHz | More than 30% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Significantly lower TDP | 16W | vs | 130W | 8.1x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 660 vs 920MX
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Bioshock Infinite
PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $200 | ||
| 660 vs 750 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | ||
| 660 vs 1050 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | ||
| 660 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | ||
| 660 vs 940MX | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | ||
| 660 vs MX150 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | $98 | |
| 660 vs 730 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | ||
| 660 vs 960 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $289 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
| | VS | |
| $289 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $289 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 vs MX150 | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 vs 1050 Ti | ||
