Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details | GeForce GTX 660 vs 920MX |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
6.7 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
| |||||||
Better PassMark score | 4,121 | vs | 986 | Around 4.2x better PassMark score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed | 5,600 MHz | vs | 1,800 MHz | More than 3x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Significantly higher memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | vs | 14.4 GB/s | Around 12.5x higher memory bandwidth | |||
Significantly better manhattan score | 12,983.16 | vs | 3,246.38 | Around 4x better manhattan score | |||
Better floating-point performance | 1,896.2 GFLOPS | vs | 548.9 GFLOPS | Around 3.5x better floating-point performance | |||
Higher texture rate | 79 GTexel/s | vs | 25.73 GTexel/s | More than 3x higher texture rate | |||
More texture mapping units | 96 | vs | 24 | 72 more texture mapping units | |||
More render output processors | 32 | vs | 8 | 24 more render output processors | |||
More shading units | 1,152 | vs | 256 | 896 more shading units | |||
Higher pixel rate | 19.75 GPixel/s | vs | 8.58 GPixel/s | More than 2.2x higher pixel rate | |||
Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,400 MHz | vs | 900 MHz | More than 55% higher memory clock speed | |||
Significantly higher bioshock infinite framerate | 57 | vs | 12.1 | Around 4.8x higher bioshock infinite framerate | |||
Better PassMark direct compute score | 1,948 | vs | 716 | Around 2.8x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
Wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 64 bit | 4x wider memory bus | |||
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 1,072 MHz | vs | 823 MHz | More than 30% higher clock speed | |||
Higher turbo clock speed | 1,176 MHz | vs | 888 MHz | More than 30% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Significantly lower TDP | 16W | vs | 130W | 8.1x lower TDP |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | $274 | |
660 vs 750 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | ||
660 vs 1050 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | ||
660 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | ||
660 vs 940MX | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | $98 | |
660 vs 730 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | ||
660 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
920MX vs 920M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
970 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs R9 380 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs R9 390 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R9 290X vs 970 | ||