GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 660 vs 930M among all GPUs


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more


Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more


Overall Score

Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 660  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 660

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 18,060 vs 2,138 Around 8.5x better 3DMark06 score
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 25,130 vs 6,557 More than 3.8x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Better PassMark score 4,121 vs 904 More than 4.5x better PassMark score
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 5,600 MHz vs 1,800 MHz More than 3x higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 179.2 GB/s vs 14.4 GB/s Around 12.5x higher memory bandwidth
Significantly better manhattan score 12,983.16 vs 3,711.04 Around 3.5x better manhattan score
Significantly better fire strike factor score 44.27 vs 13.16 More than 3.2x better fire strike factor score
Higher texture rate 79 GTexel/s vs 22.27 GTexel/s More than 3.5x higher texture rate
Better floating-point performance 1,896.2 GFLOPS vs 712.7 GFLOPS Around 2.8x better floating-point performance
More texture mapping units 96 vs 24 72 more texture mapping units
More render output processors 32 vs 8 24 more render output processors
Higher pixel rate 19.75 GPixel/s vs 7.42 GPixel/s Around 2.8x higher pixel rate
More shading units 1,152 vs 384 Three times as many shading units
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,400 MHz vs 900 MHz More than 55% higher memory clock speed
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,948 vs 618 Around 3.2x better PassMark direct compute score
Wider memory bus 256 bit vs 64 bit 4x wider memory bus
Front view of GeForce 930M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 930M

Report a correction
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 11,760 vs 6,850 More than 70% better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher clock speed 928 MHz vs 823 MHz Around 15% higher clock speed
Significantly lower TDP 33W vs 130W 3.9x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 660 vs 930M

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
GeForce 930M

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
GeForce 930M

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute


comments powered by Disqus