Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details | GeForce GTX 660 vs 930M |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
6.9 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660GPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark06 score | 18,060 | vs | 2,138 | Around 8.5x better 3DMark06 score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 25,130 | vs | 6,557 | More than 3.8x better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
Better PassMark score | 4,121 | vs | 904 | More than 4.5x better PassMark score | |||
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed | 5,600 MHz | vs | 1,800 MHz | More than 3x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Significantly higher memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | vs | 14.4 GB/s | Around 12.5x higher memory bandwidth | |||
Significantly better manhattan score | 12,983.16 | vs | 3,711.04 | Around 3.5x better manhattan score | |||
Significantly better fire strike factor score | 44.27 | vs | 13.16 | More than 3.2x better fire strike factor score | |||
Higher texture rate | 79 GTexel/s | vs | 22.27 GTexel/s | More than 3.5x higher texture rate | |||
Better floating-point performance | 1,896.2 GFLOPS | vs | 712.7 GFLOPS | Around 2.8x better floating-point performance | |||
More texture mapping units | 96 | vs | 24 | 72 more texture mapping units | |||
More render output processors | 32 | vs | 8 | 24 more render output processors | |||
Higher pixel rate | 19.75 GPixel/s | vs | 7.42 GPixel/s | Around 2.8x higher pixel rate | |||
More shading units | 1,152 | vs | 384 | Three times as many shading units | |||
Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,400 MHz | vs | 900 MHz | More than 55% higher memory clock speed | |||
Better PassMark direct compute score | 1,948 | vs | 618 | Around 3.2x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
Wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 64 bit | 4x wider memory bus | |||
| |||||||
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 11,760 | vs | 6,850 | More than 70% better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
Higher clock speed | 928 MHz | vs | 823 MHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
Significantly lower TDP | 33W | vs | 130W | 3.9x lower TDP |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | ||
GeForce GTX 1050 vs 660 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | ||
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 660 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | $200 | |
GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs 660 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | ||
GeForce 940MX vs GTX 660 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | ||
GeForce GT 1030 vs GTX 660 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | ||
GeForce GTX 960 vs 660 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$98 | $200 | |
GeForce GT 730 vs GTX 660 | ||