Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX 660 vs 930MX |
Released August, 2012
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
- 823 MHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
6.6 Out of 10
by techPowerUp! (Sep, 2012)The game graphics are, even today, top notch, yet the game still runs well on most computers.
VS
Released March, 2016
Nvidia GeForce 930MX
- 1 GHz
- 2 GB DDR3
5.9 Out of 10
by hassan-mujtaba (May, 2014)Performance figures a re not known but it is mentioned that the MX100 SSDs will feature very competitive price points which is a good sign in the SSD market since costs are going down and SSDs become the choice for storage globally due to the attractive prices.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 660 vs 930MX among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.6 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Better PassMark score | 4,121 | vs | 1,126 | Around 3.8x better PassMark score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly higher effective memory clock speed | 5,600 MHz | vs | 2,000 MHz | More than 2.8x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | vs | 16 GB/s | Around 11.2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Higher texture rate | 79 GTexel/s | vs | 24.46 GTexel/s | Around 3.2x higher texture rate | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 1,896.2 GFLOPS | vs | 782.6 GFLOPS | Around 2.5x better floating-point performance | |||
| More texture mapping units | 96 | vs | 24 | 72 more texture mapping units | |||
| More shading units | 1,152 | vs | 384 | Three times as many shading units | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Higher bioshock infinite framerate | 57 | vs | 14.35 | Around 4x higher bioshock infinite framerate | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,400 MHz | vs | 1,000 MHz | 40% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 1,948 | vs | 877 | Around 2.2x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Better T-Rex score | 2.46 frames/s | vs | 1.09 frames/s | More than 2.2x better T-Rex score | |||
| Wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 64 bit | 4x wider memory bus | |||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 1,019 MHz | vs | 823 MHz | Around 25% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 1,176 MHz | vs | 888 MHz | More than 30% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Better manhattan score | 3,713.16 | vs | 3,282.26 | Around 15% better manhattan score | |||
| Significantly lower TDP | 17W | vs | 130W | 7.6x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 660 vs 930MX
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Thief
Bioshock Infinite
Metro: Last Light
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $200 | ||
| 750 Ti vs 660 | ||
 | VS | |
| $200 | ||
| 1050 vs 660 | ||
 | VS | |
| $200 | ||
| 940MX vs 660 | ||
 | VS | |
| $200 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 660 | ||
 | VS | |
| $200 | ||
| MX150 vs 660 | ||
 | VS | |
| $98 | $200 | |
| 730 vs 660 | ||
| | VS |  |
| MX150 vs 930MX | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| RTX 2070 vs 1080 | ||
| | VS |  |
| RTX 2070 vs 1080 Ti | ||
 | VS |  |
| $286 | ||
| RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| $286 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| MX150 vs 1050 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $286 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
