Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details | GeForce GTX 660 vs GT 1030 |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
6.7 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
| |||||||
Better PassMark score | 4,121 | vs | 2,256 | Around 85% better PassMark score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly higher memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | vs | 48.06 GB/s | Around 3.8x higher memory bandwidth | |||
Significantly better manhattan score | 12,983.16 | vs | 3,714.14 | Around 3.5x better manhattan score | |||
More texture mapping units | 96 | vs | 24 | 72 more texture mapping units | |||
More render output processors | 32 | vs | 8 | 24 more render output processors | |||
Higher texture rate | 79 GTexel/s | vs | 35.23 GTexel/s | Around 2.2x higher texture rate | |||
Slightly better floating-point performance | 1,896.2 GFLOPS | vs | 1,127 GFLOPS | Around 70% better floating-point performance | |||
More shading units | 1,152 | vs | 384 | Three times as many shading units | |||
Better fire strike factor score | 44.27 | vs | 27.03 | Around 65% better fire strike factor score | |||
Slightly higher pixel rate | 19.75 GPixel/s | vs | 11.74 GPixel/s | Around 70% higher pixel rate | |||
Wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 64 bit | 4x wider memory bus | |||
| |||||||
Significantly higher clock speed | 1,227 MHz | vs | 823 MHz | Around 50% higher clock speed | |||
Much higher turbo clock speed | 1,468 MHz | vs | 888 MHz | More than 65% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Slightly higher memory clock speed | 1,502 MHz | vs | 1,400 MHz | More than 5% higher memory clock speed | |||
Significantly lower TDP | 30W | vs | 130W | 4.3x lower TDP |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1030 vs RX 550 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$98 | ||
1030 vs 730 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
1030 vs 750 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1030 vs 710 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | $274 | |
660 vs 750 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | ||
660 vs 1050 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | ||
660 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
970 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
750 Ti vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs R9 390 | ||