GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 660 vs 435M among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.7

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 660  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 660

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 18,060 vs 799 More than 22.5x better 3DMark06 score
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 25,130 vs 3,112 More than 8x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Better PassMark score 4,121 vs 661 Around 6.2x better PassMark score
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 5,600 MHz vs 1,600 MHz 3.5x higher effective memory clock speed
Much better CLBenchmark raytrace score 95,174 vs 16,706 Around 5.8x better CLBenchmark raytrace score
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 179.2 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s Around 7x higher memory bandwidth
Higher clock speed 823 MHz vs 650 MHz More than 25% higher clock speed
Better floating-point performance 1,896.2 GFLOPS vs 249.6 GFLOPS More than 7.5x better floating-point performance
Significantly better fire strike factor score 44.27 vs 7.97 More than 5.5x better fire strike factor score
Higher texture rate 79 GTexel/s vs 10.4 GTexel/s More than 7.5x higher texture rate
Significantly more render output processors 32 vs 4 28 more render output processors
Significantly more texture mapping units 96 vs 16 80 more texture mapping units
Higher pixel rate 19.75 GPixel/s vs 2.6 GPixel/s More than 7.5x higher pixel rate
More shading units 1,152 vs 96 1056 more shading units
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,400 MHz vs 800 MHz 75% higher memory clock speed
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,948 vs 301 Around 6.5x better PassMark direct compute score
Better face detection score 30.41 mPixels/s vs 4.25 mPixels/s Around 7.2x better face detection score
Front view of GeForce GT 435M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 435M

Report a correction
Significantly lower TDP 35W vs 130W 3.7x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 660 vs GT 435M

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
30.41 mPixels/s
GeForce GT 435M
4.25 mPixels/s

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

CLBenchmark Raytrace Measures compute performance using OpenCL to do raytracing

Comments

comments powered by Disqus