GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 660 vs 445M among all GPUs


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more


Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more


Overall Score

Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 660  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 660

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 18,060 vs 1,148 Around 15.8x better 3DMark06 score
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 25,130 vs 4,570 Around 5.5x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Better PassMark score 4,121 vs 1,057 Around 4x better PassMark score
Higher clock speed 823 MHz vs 570 MHz Around 45% higher clock speed
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 5,600 MHz vs 2,500 MHz Around 2.2x higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 179.2 GB/s vs 40 GB/s Around 4.5x higher memory bandwidth
Better floating-point performance 1,896.2 GFLOPS vs 328.3 GFLOPS More than 5.8x better floating-point performance
Significantly better manhattan score 12,983.16 vs 3,274.2 Around 4x better manhattan score
Higher texture rate 79 GTexel/s vs 13.68 GTexel/s More than 5.8x higher texture rate
Significantly better fire strike factor score 44.27 vs 10.88 More than 4x better fire strike factor score
More texture mapping units 96 vs 24 72 more texture mapping units
Higher pixel rate 19.75 GPixel/s vs 3.42 GPixel/s More than 5.8x higher pixel rate
Slightly more memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Much higher memory clock speed 1,400 MHz vs 625 MHz Around 2.2x higher memory clock speed
More shading units 1,152 vs 144 1008 more shading units
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,948 vs 420 Around 4.8x better PassMark direct compute score
Front view of GeForce GT 445M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 445M

Report a correction
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 10,304 vs 6,850 More than 50% better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Significantly lower TDP 35W vs 130W 3.7x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 660 vs GT 445M

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
GeForce GT 445M

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
GeForce GT 445M

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

Read more


comments powered by Disqus