GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 660 vs 630M among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.9

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 660  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 660

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 18,060 vs 1,051 Around 17.2x better 3DMark06 score
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 25,130 vs 3,985 More than 6.2x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Better PassMark score 4,121 vs 678 More than 6x better PassMark score
Much better CLBenchmark raytrace score 95,174 vs 19,285 Around 5x better CLBenchmark raytrace score
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 179.2 GB/s vs 32 GB/s More than 5.5x higher memory bandwidth
Higher effective memory clock speed 5,600 MHz vs 3,600 MHz More than 55% higher effective memory clock speed
Much higher FarCry 3 framerate 80 vs 5.05 More than 15.8x higher FarCry 3 framerate
Better floating-point performance 1,896.2 GFLOPS vs 307.2 GFLOPS Around 6.2x better floating-point performance
Much better manhattan score 12,983.16 vs 2,068.17 More than 6.2x better manhattan score
Significantly better fire strike factor score 44.27 vs 7.52 Around 6x better fire strike factor score
Higher texture rate 79 GTexel/s vs 12.8 GTexel/s Around 6.2x higher texture rate
Significantly more render output processors 32 vs 4 28 more render output processors
Significantly more texture mapping units 96 vs 16 80 more texture mapping units
Higher pixel rate 19.75 GPixel/s vs 3.2 GPixel/s Around 6.2x higher pixel rate
More shading units 1,152 vs 96 1056 more shading units
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,400 MHz vs 900 MHz More than 55% higher memory clock speed
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,948 vs 373 Around 5.2x better PassMark direct compute score
Better face detection score 30.41 mPixels/s vs 5.06 mPixels/s More than 6x better face detection score
Front view of GeForce GT 630M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 630M

Report a correction
Significantly lower TDP 33W vs 130W 3.9x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 660 vs GT 630M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
67.94 mHash/s
GeForce GT 630M
20.98 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
30.41 mPixels/s
GeForce GT 630M
5.06 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
19,695.95
GeForce GT 630M
2,994.54

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
12,983.16
GeForce GT 630M
2,068.17

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Bioshock Infinite

Metro: Last Light

Comments

Showing 1 comment.
GT630m is not GDDR5 it;s *GDDR3*
comments powered by Disqus