GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 660 vs 650M among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.9

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 660  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 660

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

Report a correction
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 25,130 vs 8,338 More than 3x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Better PassMark score 4,121 vs 1,208 Around 3.5x better PassMark score
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 5,600 MHz vs 1,800 MHz More than 3x higher effective memory clock speed
Much better CLBenchmark raytrace score 95,174 vs 36,851 More than 2.5x better CLBenchmark raytrace score
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 179.2 GB/s vs 28.8 GB/s Around 6.2x higher memory bandwidth
Better 3DMark06 score 18,060 vs 13,514 Around 35% better 3DMark06 score
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 6,850 vs 2,111.5 Around 3.2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Significantly better manhattan score 12,983.16 vs 3,685.52 More than 3.5x better manhattan score
Better floating-point performance 1,896.2 GFLOPS vs 652.8 GFLOPS Around 3x better floating-point performance
Much higher FarCry 3 framerate 80 vs 25 Around 3.2x higher FarCry 3 framerate
Higher texture rate 79 GTexel/s vs 27.2 GTexel/s Around 3x higher texture rate
Slightly more memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Significantly better fire strike factor score 44.27 vs 20.58 Around 2.2x better fire strike factor score
More texture mapping units 96 vs 32 Three times as many texture mapping units
Higher pixel rate 19.75 GPixel/s vs 6.8 GPixel/s Around 3x higher pixel rate
More shading units 1,152 vs 384 Three times as many shading units
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,400 MHz vs 900 MHz More than 55% higher memory clock speed
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,948 vs 616 Around 3.2x better PassMark direct compute score
Better face detection score 30.41 mPixels/s vs 9.87 mPixels/s More than 3x better face detection score
Front view of GeForce GT 650M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 650M

Report a correction
Lower TDP 45W vs 130W 2.9x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 660 vs GT 650M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
67.94 mHash/s
GeForce GT 650M
22.46 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
30.41 mPixels/s
GeForce GT 650M
9.87 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
19,695.95
GeForce GT 650M
3,342.1

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
12,983.16
GeForce GT 650M
3,685.52

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Bioshock Infinite

Metro: Last Light

Comments

comments powered by Disqus