GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 660 vs 705 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.7

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 660  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 660

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

Report a correction
Significantly better PassMark score 4,121 vs 409 More than 10x better PassMark score
Much higher effective memory clock speed 5,600 MHz vs 1,650 MHz Around 3.5x higher effective memory clock speed
Much higher memory bandwidth 179.2 GB/s vs 13.2 GB/s More than 13.5x higher memory bandwidth
Better floating-point performance 1,896.2 GFLOPS vs 167.8 GFLOPS More than 11.2x better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 79 GTexel/s vs 13.98 GTexel/s Around 5.8x higher texture rate
Significantly more texture mapping units 96 vs 8 88 more texture mapping units
Significantly more render output processors 32 vs 4 28 more render output processors
Significantly better manhattan score 12,983.16 vs 1,252.59 More than 10.2x better manhattan score
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Significantly more shading units 1,152 vs 48 1104 more shading units
Higher pixel rate 19.75 GPixel/s vs 3.5 GPixel/s Around 5.8x higher pixel rate
Much higher memory clock speed 1,400 MHz vs 825 MHz Around 70% higher memory clock speed
Significantly wider memory bus 256 bit vs 64 bit 4x wider memory bus
Significantly better PassMark direct compute score 1,948 vs 228 More than 8.5x better PassMark direct compute score
Better bitcoin mining score 67.94 mHash/s vs 11.06 mHash/s Around 6.2x better bitcoin mining score
Front view of GeForce GT 705

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 705

Report a correction
Significantly lower TDP 29W vs 130W 4.5x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 660 vs GT 705

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
67.94 mHash/s
GeForce GT 705
11.06 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
30.41 mPixels/s
GeForce GT 705
3.15 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
706.33 frames/s
GeForce GT 705
84.6 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
299.58 mInteraction/s
GeForce GT 705
25.53 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
3.08 frames/s
GeForce GT 705
0.29 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
35.42 frames/s
GeForce GT 705
-1 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
19,695.95
GeForce GT 705
1,798.2

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
12,983.16
GeForce GT 705
1,252.59

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus