GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 660 vs 730M among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.9

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 660  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 660

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

Report a correction
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 25,130 vs 5,875.5 More than 4.2x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Better PassMark score 4,121 vs 810 More than 5x better PassMark score
Significantly better 3DMark06 score 18,060 vs 10,884 More than 65% better 3DMark06 score
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 5,600 MHz vs 1,800 MHz More than 3x higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 179.2 GB/s vs 14.4 GB/s Around 12.5x higher memory bandwidth
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 6,850 vs 1,777 More than 3.8x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher clock speed 823 MHz vs 719 MHz Around 15% higher clock speed
Significantly better manhattan score 12,983.16 vs 2,992.38 More than 4.2x better manhattan score
Much higher FarCry 3 framerate 80 vs 15.5 Around 5.2x higher FarCry 3 framerate
Higher texture rate 79 GTexel/s vs 11.5 GTexel/s More than 6.8x higher texture rate
Better floating-point performance 1,896.2 GFLOPS vs 552.2 GFLOPS Around 3.5x better floating-point performance
Significantly more texture mapping units 96 vs 16 80 more texture mapping units
Significantly better fire strike factor score 44.27 vs 16.31 Around 2.8x better fire strike factor score
More render output processors 32 vs 8 24 more render output processors
Higher pixel rate 19.75 GPixel/s vs 5.75 GPixel/s Around 3.5x higher pixel rate
More shading units 1,152 vs 384 Three times as many shading units
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,400 MHz vs 900 MHz More than 55% higher memory clock speed
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,948 vs 560 Around 3.5x better PassMark direct compute score
Better face detection score 30.41 mPixels/s vs 7.81 mPixels/s Around 4x better face detection score
Front view of GeForce GT 730M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 730M

Report a correction
Significantly lower TDP 33W vs 130W 3.9x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 660 vs GT 730M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
67.94 mHash/s
GeForce GT 730M
30.63 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
30.41 mPixels/s
GeForce GT 730M
7.81 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
19,695.95
GeForce GT 730M
3,365.34

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
12,983.16
GeForce GT 730M
2,992.38

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Bioshock Infinite

Comments

comments powered by Disqus