GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 660 vs 750M among all GPUs


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more


Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more


Overall Score

Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 660  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 660

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

Report a correction
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 25,130 vs 8,200 More than 3x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Better PassMark score 4,121 vs 1,288 Around 3.2x better PassMark score
Much better CLBenchmark raytrace score 95,174 vs 38,698 Around 2.5x better CLBenchmark raytrace score
Higher memory bandwidth 179.2 GB/s vs 64 GB/s More than 2.8x higher memory bandwidth
Better 3DMark06 score 18,060 vs 13,670 More than 30% better 3DMark06 score
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 6,850 vs 2,543 Around 2.8x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher effective memory clock speed 5,600 MHz vs 4,000 MHz 40% higher effective memory clock speed
Much higher FarCry 3 framerate 80 vs 10.5 More than 7.5x higher FarCry 3 framerate
Significantly better manhattan score 12,983.16 vs 3,570.08 Around 3.8x better manhattan score
Better floating-point performance 1,896.2 GFLOPS vs 722.7 GFLOPS More than 2.5x better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 79 GTexel/s vs 30.11 GTexel/s More than 2.5x higher texture rate
More texture mapping units 96 vs 32 Three times as many texture mapping units
Better fire strike factor score 44.27 vs 23.78 More than 85% better fire strike factor score
Higher pixel rate 19.75 GPixel/s vs 7.53 GPixel/s More than 2.5x higher pixel rate
More shading units 1,152 vs 384 Three times as many shading units
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
Higher memory clock speed 1,400 MHz vs 1,000 MHz 40% higher memory clock speed
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,948 vs 733 Around 2.8x better PassMark direct compute score
Better face detection score 30.41 mPixels/s vs 16.18 mPixels/s Around 90% better face detection score
Front view of GeForce GT 750M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 750M

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 941 MHz vs 823 MHz Around 15% higher clock speed
Slightly higher turbo clock speed 967 MHz vs 888 MHz Around 10% higher turbo clock speed
Lower TDP 50W vs 130W 2.6x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 660 vs GT 750M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
67.94 mHash/s
GeForce GT 750M
27.59 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
30.41 mPixels/s
GeForce GT 750M
16.18 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
GeForce GT 750M

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
GeForce GT 750M

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Bioshock Infinite


comments powered by Disqus