Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX 660 vs 1050 |
Released August, 2012
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
- 823 MHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
6.7 Out of 10
by techPowerUp! (Sep, 2012)The game graphics are, even today, top notch, yet the game still runs well on most computers.
VS
Released October, 2016
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
- 1.4 GHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
7 Out of 10
by www.tweaktown.com (Oct, 2016)NVIDIA's impressive Pascal architecture has some nice tricks under its 16nm FinFET hood, but the Twin Frozr VI cooler is 40% quieter than its predecessor (the Twin Frozr V), and it also keeps the card 20% cooler.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 660 vs 1050 among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 7 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | vs | 112.1 GB/s | Around 60% higher memory bandwidth | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More texture mapping units | 96 | vs | 40 | 56 more texture mapping units | |||
| Slightly higher texture rate | 79 GTexel/s | vs | 54.2 GTexel/s | More than 45% higher texture rate | |||
| More shading units | 1,152 | vs | 640 | 512 more shading units | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 1,354 MHz | vs | 823 MHz | Around 65% higher clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 1,455 MHz | vs | 888 MHz | Around 65% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 7,008 MHz | vs | 5,600 MHz | More than 25% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 43.3 GPixel/s | vs | 19.75 GPixel/s | Around 2.2x higher pixel rate | |||
| Better T-Rex score | 4.8 frames/s | vs | 2.43 frames/s | Around 2x better T-Rex score | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,752 MHz | vs | 1,400 MHz | More than 25% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 2,884 | vs | 1,947 | Around 50% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Lower TDP | 75W | vs | 130W | More than 40% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 660 vs 1050
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Bioshock Infinite
Metro: Last Light
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 1050 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 vs RX 460 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 vs 750 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 vs 960M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 vs RX 560 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 vs 950 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS | |
| $273 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| $273 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
 | VS |  |
| 1080 vs 1080 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| RX 460 vs 1050 | ||
