Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details | GeForce GTX 660 vs 1050 Ti |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
7 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
| ![]() | Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 TiGPUBoss Winner |
| |||||||
Higher memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | vs | 112.1 GB/s | Around 60% higher memory bandwidth | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly better manhattan score | 12,983.16 | vs | 3,721.86 | Around 3.5x better manhattan score | |||
More texture mapping units | 96 | vs | 48 | Twice as many texture mapping units | |||
More shading units | 1,152 | vs | 768 | 384 more shading units | |||
| |||||||
Significantly higher clock speed | 1,291 MHz | vs | 823 MHz | More than 55% higher clock speed | |||
Better PassMark score | 5,757 | vs | 4,121 | Around 40% better PassMark score | |||
More memory | 4,096 MB | vs | 2,048 MB | 2x more memory | |||
Higher effective memory clock speed | 7,008 MHz | vs | 5,600 MHz | More than 25% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 1,392 MHz | vs | 888 MHz | More than 55% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Higher pixel rate | 41.3 GPixel/s | vs | 19.75 GPixel/s | More than 2x higher pixel rate | |||
Better video composition score | 75.17 frames/s | vs | 35.42 frames/s | More than 2x better video composition score | |||
Higher memory clock speed | 1,752 MHz | vs | 1,400 MHz | More than 25% higher memory clock speed | |||
Better PassMark direct compute score | 3,271 | vs | 1,948 | Around 70% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
Better fire strike factor score | 51.07 | vs | 44.27 | More than 15% better fire strike factor score | |||
Higher bioshock infinite framerate | 75.9 | vs | 57 | Around 35% higher bioshock infinite framerate | |||
Lower TDP | 75W | vs | 130W | More than 40% lower TDP |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 1050 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs RX 570 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs RX 470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs RX 560 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
970 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1060 vs RX 580 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs R9 390 | ||