Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX 660 vs 1050 Ti |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 660 vs 1050 Ti among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 7 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 TiGPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | vs | 112.1 GB/s | Around 60% higher memory bandwidth | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly better manhattan score | 12,983.16 | vs | 3,721.86 | Around 3.5x better manhattan score | |||
| More texture mapping units | 96 | vs | 48 | Twice as many texture mapping units | |||
| More shading units | 1,152 | vs | 768 | 384 more shading units | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 1,291 MHz | vs | 823 MHz | More than 55% higher clock speed | |||
| Better PassMark score | 5,757 | vs | 4,121 | Around 40% better PassMark score | |||
| More memory | 4,096 MB | vs | 2,048 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 7,008 MHz | vs | 5,600 MHz | More than 25% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 1,392 MHz | vs | 888 MHz | More than 55% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 41.3 GPixel/s | vs | 19.75 GPixel/s | More than 2x higher pixel rate | |||
| Better video composition score | 75.17 frames/s | vs | 35.42 frames/s | More than 2x better video composition score | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,752 MHz | vs | 1,400 MHz | More than 25% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 3,271 | vs | 1,948 | Around 70% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Better fire strike factor score | 51.07 | vs | 44.27 | More than 15% better fire strike factor score | |||
| Higher bioshock infinite framerate | 75.9 | vs | 57 | Around 35% higher bioshock infinite framerate | |||
| Lower TDP | 75W | vs | 130W | More than 40% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 660 vs 1050 Ti
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Bioshock Infinite
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs 1050 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs RX 470 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $274 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 750 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs RX 560 | ||
Popular Comparisons
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 960 vs R9 380 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 390 | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
