Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 660

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

Report a correction
Much higher effective memory clock speed 5,600 MHz vs 1,998 MHz More than 2.8x higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly better PassMark score 4,121 vs 1,050 Around 4x better PassMark score
Higher clock speed 823 MHz vs 576 MHz Around 45% higher clock speed
Significantly better T-Rex score 19,695.95 vs 4,542.92 More than 4.2x better T-Rex score
Better floating-point performance 1,896.2 GFLOPS vs 1,192.4 GFLOPS Around 60% better floating-point performance
More shading units 1,152 vs 480 672 more shading units
Better cloud gate factor score 19.42 vs 15.95 More than 20% better cloud gate factor score
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,400 MHz vs 999 MHz More than 40% higher memory clock speed
Much lower TDP 130W vs 289W 2.2x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 295

Reasons to consider the
EVGA GeForce GTX 295

Report a correction
Is dual GPU Yes vs No About half of graphics cards are dual GPU
Much wider memory bus 896 bit vs 256 bit 3.5x wider memory bus
Higher memory bandwidth 223.8 GB/s vs 179.2 GB/s Around 25% higher memory bandwidth
Significantly more texture mapping units 160 vs 96 64 more texture mapping units
Significantly more render output processors 56 vs 32 24 more render output processors
Higher pixel rate 32.26 GPixel/s vs 19.75 GPixel/s Around 65% higher pixel rate

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 660 vs 295

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
GeForce GTX 295

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Read more


comments powered by Disqus