GeForce GTX 660M vs 840M |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 660M vs 840M among Laptop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660MGPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark06 score | 14,704 | vs | 2,338 | More than 6.2x better 3DMark06 score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better PassMark score | 1,412 | vs | 879 | More than 60% better PassMark score | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 4,000 MHz | vs | 2,002 MHz | Around 2x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Much higher diablo III framerate | 67 fps | vs | 17.7 fps | More than 3.8x higher diablo III framerate | |||
| Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 9,803 | vs | 6,627 | Around 50% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | vs | 16.02 GB/s | Around 4x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Much higher battlefield 4 framerate | 35.45 | vs | 11.2 | Around 3.2x higher battlefield 4 framerate | |||
| More memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Higher crysis 3 framerate | 10 fps | vs | 6.3 fps | Around 60% higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
| More render output processors | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Wider memory bus | 128 bit | vs | 64 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
| More texture mapping units | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many texture mapping units | |||
| Higher BioShock infinite framerate | 22.9 fps | vs | 13.5 fps | Around 70% higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
| |||||||
| Better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 10,332 | vs | 2,369 | More than 4.2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
| Higher clock speed | 1,029 MHz | vs | 835 MHz | Around 25% higher clock speed | |||
| Significantly better T-Rex score | 3,359.62 | vs | 3,353.58 | Almost the same | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 1,124 MHz | vs | 950 MHz | Around 20% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Better particle simulation score | 184.99 mInteraction/s | vs | 141.21 mInteraction/s | More than 30% better particle simulation score | |||
| Slightly lower TDP | 33W | vs | 50W | Around 35% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 660M vs 840M
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Thief
Battlefield 4
Laptops
Looking for a laptop?
- 2 laptops with the GeForce GTX 660M, starting from $1,000
- 20 laptops with the GeForce 840M, starting from $579
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 840M vs 740M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 840M vs 850M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 840M vs 920M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 840M vs 820M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 840M vs 750M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 840M vs 940M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 840M vs R7 M265 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS |  |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 960 vs R9 380 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 390 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 290X vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
