GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 670 vs 525M among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.4

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 670 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 670  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 670

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 670

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 29,150 vs 799 Around 36.5x better 3DMark06 score
Much better 3DMark vantage graphics score 31,610 vs 3,230 More than 9.8x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Significantly better PassMark score 5,374 vs 599 Around 9x better PassMark score
Significantly higher clock speed 915 MHz vs 600 MHz Around 55% higher clock speed
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 6,008 MHz vs 1,800 MHz More than 3.2x higher effective memory clock speed
Much better CLBenchmark raytrace score 151,366 vs 27,128 More than 5.5x better CLBenchmark raytrace score
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 192.3 GB/s vs 28.8 GB/s Around 6.8x higher memory bandwidth
Much better cloud gate factor score 20.91 vs 8.32 More than 2.5x better cloud gate factor score
Better floating-point performance 2,459.5 GFLOPS vs 230.4 GFLOPS Around 10.8x better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 102.5 GTexel/s vs 9.6 GTexel/s Around 10.8x higher texture rate
Higher pixel rate 25.62 GPixel/s vs 2.4 GPixel/s Around 10.8x higher pixel rate
Significantly more texture mapping units 112 vs 16 96 more texture mapping units
Slightly better 3DMark 11 graphics score 9,600 vs 7,058.5 More than 35% better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Significantly more render output processors 32 vs 4 28 more render output processors
Significantly more shading units 1,344 vs 96 1248 more shading units
Significantly better video composition score 69.27 frames/s vs 6.73 frames/s More than 10.2x better video composition score
Slightly more memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,502 MHz vs 900 MHz More than 65% higher memory clock speed
Significantly better PassMark direct compute score 2,578 vs 280 Around 9.2x better PassMark direct compute score
Front view of GeForce GT 525M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 525M

Report a correction
Significantly lower TDP 23W vs 170W 7.4x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 670 vs GT 525M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 670
97.36 mHash/s
GeForce GT 525M
14.79 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 670
42.55 mPixels/s
GeForce GT 525M
5.1 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 670
1,143.56 frames/s
GeForce GT 525M
179.45 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 670
3,358.68
GeForce GT 525M
3,179.43

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 670
3,710.86
GeForce GT 525M
2,921.39

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus