GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 675M vs 750M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.2

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 675M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 675M  based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 675M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 675M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 20,452.5 vs 13,670 Around 50% better 3DMark06 score
Better PassMark score 2,142 vs 1,288 More than 65% better PassMark score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 13,805 vs 8,200 Around 70% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Higher memory bandwidth 96 GB/s vs 64 GB/s 50% higher memory bandwidth
Significantly better video composition score 33.98 frames/s vs 10.87 frames/s Around 3.2x better video composition score
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
Significantly wider memory bus 256 bit vs 128 bit 2x wider memory bus
More texture mapping units 64 vs 32 Twice as many texture mapping units
Significantly higher crysis 3 framerate 13.9 fps vs 9.85 fps More than 40% higher crysis 3 framerate
Higher bioshock infinite framerate 28.6 vs 15.5 Around 85% higher bioshock infinite framerate
Higher diablo III framerate 73.91 fps vs 66.6 fps More than 10% higher diablo III framerate
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 28.6 fps vs 16.3 fps More than 75% higher BioShock infinite framerate
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,021 vs 733 Around 40% better PassMark direct compute score
Front view of GeForce GT 750M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 750M

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 941 MHz vs 620 MHz More than 50% higher clock speed
Much better T-Rex score 3,360.34 vs 3,350.04 Almost the same
Higher effective memory clock speed 4,000 MHz vs 3,000 MHz Around 35% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 750 MHz Around 35% higher memory clock speed
Lower TDP 50W vs 100W 2x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 675M vs GT 750M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 675M
59.01 mHash/s
GeForce GT 750M
27.59 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 675M
22.12 mPixels/s
GeForce GT 750M
16.18 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 675M
3,350.04
GeForce GT 750M
3,360.34

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 675M
3,699.28
GeForce GT 750M
3,570.08

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Bioshock Infinite

Comments

comments powered by Disqus