Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 680
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 680 based on its benchmarks.
See full details | GeForce GTX 680 vs 1050 |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
6.7 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 680GPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
| |||||||
Better PassMark score | 5,693 | vs | 4,443 | Around 30% better PassMark score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher memory bandwidth | 192.3 GB/s | vs | 112.1 GB/s | More than 70% higher memory bandwidth | |||
Higher texture rate | 128.8 GTexel/s | vs | 58.2 GTexel/s | Around 2.2x higher texture rate | |||
Significantly more texture mapping units | 128 | vs | 40 | 88 more texture mapping units | |||
Better floating-point performance | 3,090.4 GFLOPS | vs | 1,862 GFLOPS | More than 65% better floating-point performance | |||
More shading units | 1,536 | vs | 640 | 896 more shading units | |||
Better sky diver factor score | 381.6 | vs | 303.85 | More than 25% better sky diver factor score | |||
Better video composition score | 72.95 frames/s | vs | 32.65 frames/s | Around 2.2x better video composition score | |||
| |||||||
Significantly higher clock speed | 1,354 MHz | vs | 1,006 MHz | Around 35% higher clock speed | |||
Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 1,455 MHz | vs | 1,058 MHz | Around 40% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Higher effective memory clock speed | 7,008 MHz | vs | 6,008 MHz | More than 15% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Higher pixel rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | vs | 32.2 GPixel/s | Around 45% higher pixel rate | |||
Higher memory clock speed | 1,752 MHz | vs | 1,502 MHz | More than 15% higher memory clock speed | |||
Significantly lower TDP | 75W | vs | 195W | 2.6x lower TDP |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 vs MX150 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 vs RX 460 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 vs RX 550 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
680 vs 770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
970 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1060 vs RX 580 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
750 Ti vs 960 | ||