Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX 680 vs 1050 Ti |
Released March, 2012
Nvidia GeForce GTX 680
- 1 GHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
6.5 Out of 10
by techPowerUp! (Apr, 2012)Overall decent overclocking, it is nice to see that there is still some additional headroom for overclocking, despite the out of the large box overclock.
VS
Released October, 2016
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- 1.3 GHz
- 4 GB GDDR5
7.1 Out of 10
by www.tweaktown.com (Oct, 2016)NVIDIA's impressive Pascal architecture has some nice tricks under its 16nm FinFET hood, but the Twin Frozr VI cooler is 40% quieter than its predecessor (the Twin Frozr V), and it also keeps the card 20% cooler.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 680 vs 1050 Ti among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 7.1 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 TiGPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 192.3 GB/s | vs | 112.1 GB/s | More than 70% higher memory bandwidth | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher texture rate | 128.8 GTexel/s | vs | 62 GTexel/s | More than 2x higher texture rate | |||
| Significantly more texture mapping units | 128 | vs | 48 | 80 more texture mapping units | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 3,090.4 GFLOPS | vs | 1,983 GFLOPS | More than 55% better floating-point performance | |||
| More shading units | 1,536 | vs | 768 | Twice as many shading units | |||
| Better ocean surface simulation score | 1,504.98 frames/s | vs | 1,141.04 frames/s | More than 30% better ocean surface simulation score | |||
| Better sky diver factor score | 381.6 | vs | 348.62 | Around 10% better sky diver factor score | |||
| Slightly wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 128 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 1,291 MHz | vs | 1,006 MHz | Around 30% higher clock speed | |||
| More memory | 4,096 MB | vs | 2,048 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 7,008 MHz | vs | 6,008 MHz | More than 15% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 1,392 MHz | vs | 1,058 MHz | More than 30% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Slightly higher pixel rate | 41.3 GPixel/s | vs | 32.2 GPixel/s | Around 30% higher pixel rate | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,752 MHz | vs | 1,502 MHz | More than 15% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Higher bioshock infinite framerate | 75.9 | vs | 55.8 | More than 35% higher bioshock infinite framerate | |||
| Significantly lower TDP | 75W | vs | 195W | 2.6x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 680 vs 1050 Ti
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Battlefield 4
Bioshock Infinite
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $277 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs 1050 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs RX 570 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs 750 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs RX 580 | ||
Popular Comparisons
| | VS | |
| $277 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 vs MX150 | ||
| | VS | |
| $277 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| $277 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 1070 vs RX 580 | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
