Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti based on its compute performance.
See full details | GeForce GTX 680 vs 1050 Ti |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
7 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
| ![]() | Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 TiGPUBoss Winner |
| |||||||
Higher memory bandwidth | 192.3 GB/s | vs | 112.1 GB/s | More than 70% higher memory bandwidth | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher texture rate | 128.8 GTexel/s | vs | 62 GTexel/s | More than 2x higher texture rate | |||
Significantly more texture mapping units | 128 | vs | 48 | 80 more texture mapping units | |||
Better floating-point performance | 3,090.4 GFLOPS | vs | 1,983 GFLOPS | More than 55% better floating-point performance | |||
More shading units | 1,536 | vs | 768 | Twice as many shading units | |||
Better sky diver factor score | 381.6 | vs | 348.62 | Around 10% better sky diver factor score | |||
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 1,291 MHz | vs | 1,006 MHz | Around 30% higher clock speed | |||
More memory | 4,096 MB | vs | 2,048 MB | 2x more memory | |||
Higher effective memory clock speed | 7,008 MHz | vs | 6,008 MHz | More than 15% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 1,392 MHz | vs | 1,058 MHz | More than 30% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Slightly higher pixel rate | 41.3 GPixel/s | vs | 32.2 GPixel/s | Around 30% higher pixel rate | |||
Higher memory clock speed | 1,752 MHz | vs | 1,502 MHz | More than 15% higher memory clock speed | |||
Higher bioshock infinite framerate | 75.9 | vs | 55.8 | More than 35% higher bioshock infinite framerate | |||
Significantly lower TDP | 75W | vs | 195W | 2.6x lower TDP |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 1050 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs RX 470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
1050 Ti vs 750 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
680 vs 770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
970 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs R9 380 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs R9 390 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R9 290X vs 970 | ||