0 Comments
| GeForce GTX 680M vs 285M |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much better PassMark score | 3,377 | vs | 750 | More than 4.5x better PassMark score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly more memory | 4,096 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 4x more memory | |||
Higher clock speed | 719 MHz | vs | 600 MHz | Around 20% higher clock speed | |||
Better floating-point performance | 1,932.7 GFLOPS | vs | 384 GFLOPS | More than 5x better floating-point performance | |||
Higher effective memory clock speed | 3,600 MHz | vs | 2,000 MHz | 80% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Higher memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | vs | 64 GB/s | 80% higher memory bandwidth | |||
Significantly more shading units | 1,344 | vs | 128 | 1216 more shading units | |||
Higher texture rate | 80.5 GTexel/s | vs | 38.4 GTexel/s | More than 2x higher texture rate | |||
More texture mapping units | 112 | vs | 64 | 48 more texture mapping units | |||
More render output processors | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
Higher pixel rate | 20.13 GPixel/s | vs | 9.6 GPixel/s | More than 2x higher pixel rate | |||
Better cloud gate factor score | 19.29 | vs | 12.16 | Around 60% better cloud gate factor score | |||
| |||||||
Higher memory clock speed | 1,000 MHz | vs | 900 MHz | More than 10% higher memory clock speed | |||
Lower TDP | 75W | vs | 100W | 25% lower TDP |
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 680M vs 285M
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
GeForce GTX 680M
3,377
GeForce GTX 285M
750
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
GeForce GTX 680M
19.29
GeForce GTX 285M
12.16