GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 680M vs 675M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.4

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 680M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 680M  based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 680M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 680M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score 22,760 vs 3,218 More than 7x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Significantly better PassMark score 3,377 vs 2,142 Around 60% better PassMark score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 20,891 vs 13,805 More than 50% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Much higher diablo III framerate 157.25 fps vs 73.91 fps Around 2.2x higher diablo III framerate
More memory 4,096 MB vs 2,048 MB 2x more memory
Higher clock speed 719 MHz vs 620 MHz More than 15% higher clock speed
Better floating-point performance 1,932.7 GFLOPS vs 952.3 GFLOPS More than 2x better floating-point performance
Significantly better T-Rex score 3,356.7 vs 3,350.04 Almost the same
Higher texture rate 80.5 GTexel/s vs 39.7 GTexel/s More than 2x higher texture rate
Significantly more shading units 1,344 vs 384 960 more shading units
Much higher crysis 3 framerate 21.8 fps vs 13.9 fps More than 55% higher crysis 3 framerate
More texture mapping units 112 vs 64 48 more texture mapping units
Slightly higher effective memory clock speed 3,600 MHz vs 3,000 MHz 20% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher pixel rate 20.13 GPixel/s vs 9.92 GPixel/s More than 2x higher pixel rate
Slightly higher memory bandwidth 115.2 GB/s vs 96 GB/s More than 20% higher memory bandwidth
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,775 vs 1,021 Around 75% better PassMark direct compute score
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 45.8 fps vs 28.6 fps More than 60% higher BioShock infinite framerate
Higher metro: last light framerate 30.5 vs 20.7 More than 45% higher metro: last light framerate
Better cloud gate factor score 19.29 vs 16.76 More than 15% better cloud gate factor score
Higher memory clock speed 900 MHz vs 750 MHz 20% higher memory clock speed
Slightly better face detection score 28.08 mPixels/s vs 22.12 mPixels/s More than 25% better face detection score
Front view of GeForce GTX 675M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 675M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 20,452.5 vs 5,897.5 Around 3.5x better 3DMark06 score

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 680M vs 675M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 680M
99.75 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 675M
59.01 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 680M
28.08 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 675M
22.12 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Bioshock Infinite

Crysis 3

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus