GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 680MX vs 680M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.9

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 680M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 680M  based on its benchmarks.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 680MX

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 680MX

Report a correction
Much higher dead space 3 framerate 133 fps vs 111.1 fps Around 20% higher dead space 3 framerate
Much higher memory clock speed 2,500 MHz vs 900 MHz More than 2.8x higher memory clock speed
Better PassMark score 4,371 vs 3,377 Around 30% better PassMark score
Higher effective memory clock speed 5,000 MHz vs 3,600 MHz Around 40% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 160 GB/s vs 115.2 GB/s Around 40% higher memory bandwidth
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 25,270 vs 20,891 More than 20% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
More texture mapping units 128 vs 112 16 more texture mapping units
Slightly more shading units 1,536 vs 1,344 192 more shading units
Front view of GeForce GTX 680M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 680M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score 22,760 vs 6,736 Around 3.5x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
More memory 4,096 MB vs 2,048 MB 2x more memory
Much higher hitman: absolution framerate 111 vs 34.4 Around 3.2x higher hitman: absolution framerate
Much better CLBenchmark raytrace score 112,019 vs 96,302 More than 15% better CLBenchmark raytrace score
Lower TDP 100W vs 122W Around 20% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 680MX vs 680M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 680MX
56.71 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 680M
99.75 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 680MX
25.42 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 680M
28.08 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 680MX
734.94 frames/s
GeForce GTX 680M
879.57 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 680MX
281.97 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 680M
327.68 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 680MX
2.31 frames/s
GeForce GTX 680M
2.82 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 680MX
35.43 frames/s
GeForce GTX 680M
40.15 frames/s

Hitman: Absolution

Battlefield 3

Comments

comments powered by Disqus