GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 690 vs 1050 Ti among all GPUs


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more


Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 690

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

Report a correction
Is dual GPU Yes vs No About half of graphics cards are dual GPU
Much higher memory bandwidth 384.6 GB/s vs 112.1 GB/s Around 3.5x higher memory bandwidth
Much higher texture rate 234.2 GTexel/s vs 62 GTexel/s More than 3.8x higher texture rate
Significantly better floating-point performance 5,621.8 GFLOPS vs 1,983 GFLOPS More than 2.8x better floating-point performance
Many more texture mapping units 256 vs 48 208 more texture mapping units
Many more shading units 3,072 vs 768 2304 more shading units
Significantly more render output processors 64 vs 32 Twice as many render output processors
Higher pixel rate 58.56 GPixel/s vs 41.3 GPixel/s More than 40% higher pixel rate
Better fire strike factor score 71.92 vs 51.07 More than 40% better fire strike factor score
Better ocean surface simulation score 1,403.86 frames/s vs 758.38 frames/s More than 85% better ocean surface simulation score
Higher crysis 3 framerate 53 vs 35.8 Around 50% higher crysis 3 framerate
Wider memory bus 512 bit vs 128 bit 4x wider memory bus
Slightly better T-Rex score 5,028 vs 3,355.74 Around 50% better T-Rex score
Front view of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 1,291 MHz vs 915 MHz More than 40% higher clock speed
Higher effective memory clock speed 7,008 MHz vs 6,008 MHz More than 15% higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 1,392 MHz vs 1,019 MHz More than 35% higher turbo clock speed
Higher memory clock speed 1,752 MHz vs 1,502 MHz More than 15% higher memory clock speed
Much lower TDP 75W vs 300W 4x lower TDP
Better PassMark direct compute score 3,271 vs 2,523 Around 30% better PassMark direct compute score

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 690 vs 1050 Ti

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 690
97.86 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
262.69 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 690
44.37 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
75.55 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark


comments powered by Disqus