Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX 750 Ti Fake Card vs 660 |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 750 Ti Fake Card vs 660 among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.5 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Nvidia GeForce GTX 660GPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 16,033.5 | vs | 6,850 | More than 2.2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower TDP | 106W | vs | 130W | Around 20% lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark06 score | 18,060 | vs | 1,887.5 | More than 9.5x better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 25,130 | vs | 8,551 | Around 3x better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Better PassMark score | 4,121 | vs | 1,557 | Around 2.8x better PassMark score | |||
| Much higher memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | vs | 57.73 GB/s | More than 3x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Significantly higher effective memory clock speed | 5,600 MHz | vs | 3,608 MHz | More than 55% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 1,896.2 GFLOPS | vs | 601.3 GFLOPS | Around 3.2x better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher texture rate | 79 GTexel/s | vs | 25.06 GTexel/s | Around 3.2x higher texture rate | |||
| Significantly better fire strike factor score | 44.27 | vs | 13.4 | More than 3.2x better fire strike factor score | |||
| Significantly more texture mapping units | 96 | vs | 32 | Three times as many texture mapping units | |||
| Significantly more shading units | 1,152 | vs | 192 | 960 more shading units | |||
| Significantly better manhattan score | 12,983.16 | vs | 3,689.87 | More than 3.5x better manhattan score | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 19.75 GPixel/s | vs | 6.26 GPixel/s | Around 3.2x higher pixel rate | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,400 MHz | vs | 902 MHz | More than 55% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 128 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 1,948 | vs | 716 | Around 2.8x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 750 Ti Fake Card vs 660
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $274 | $200 | |
| GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs 660 | ||
 | VS | |
| $200 | ||
| GeForce GTX 1050 vs 660 | ||
 | VS | |
| $200 | ||
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 660 | ||
 | VS | |
| $200 | ||
| GeForce 940MX vs GTX 660 | ||
 | VS | |
| $98 | $200 | |
| GeForce GT 730 vs GTX 660 | ||
 | VS | |
| $200 | ||
| GeForce GTX 960 vs 660 | ||
 | VS | |
| $200 | ||
| GeForce 920M vs GTX 660 | ||
