GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 750 Ti Fake Card vs 660 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 660  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 750 Ti Fake Card

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti Fake Card

Report a correction
Significantly better 3DMark 11 graphics score 16,033.5 vs 6,850 More than 2.2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Lower TDP 106W vs 130W Around 20% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 660

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 18,060 vs 1,887.5 More than 9.5x better 3DMark06 score
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 25,130 vs 8,551 Around 3x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Better PassMark score 4,121 vs 1,557 Around 2.8x better PassMark score
Much higher memory bandwidth 179.2 GB/s vs 57.73 GB/s More than 3x higher memory bandwidth
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 5,600 MHz vs 3,608 MHz More than 55% higher effective memory clock speed
Better floating-point performance 1,896.2 GFLOPS vs 601.3 GFLOPS Around 3.2x better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 79 GTexel/s vs 25.06 GTexel/s Around 3.2x higher texture rate
Significantly better fire strike factor score 44.27 vs 13.4 More than 3.2x better fire strike factor score
Significantly more texture mapping units 96 vs 32 Three times as many texture mapping units
Significantly more shading units 1,152 vs 192 960 more shading units
Significantly better manhattan score 12,983.16 vs 3,689.87 More than 3.5x better manhattan score
Higher pixel rate 19.75 GPixel/s vs 6.26 GPixel/s Around 3.2x higher pixel rate
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,400 MHz vs 902 MHz More than 55% higher memory clock speed
Wider memory bus 256 bit vs 128 bit 2x wider memory bus
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,948 vs 716 Around 2.8x better PassMark direct compute score

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 750 Ti Fake Card vs 660

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
67.94 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
30.41 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
706.33 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Comments

comments powered by Disqus