GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 750 Ti Fake Card vs 670 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 670 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 670  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 750 Ti Fake Card

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti Fake Card

Report a correction
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 16,033.5 vs 9,600 More than 65% better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Lower TDP 106W vs 170W Around 40% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 670

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 670

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 29,150 vs 1,887.5 Around 15.5x better 3DMark06 score
Much better 3DMark vantage graphics score 31,610 vs 8,551 Around 3.8x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Significantly better PassMark score 5,374 vs 1,557 Around 3.5x better PassMark score
Much higher memory bandwidth 192.3 GB/s vs 57.73 GB/s More than 3.2x higher memory bandwidth
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 6,008 MHz vs 3,608 MHz More than 65% higher effective memory clock speed
Better floating-point performance 2,459.5 GFLOPS vs 601.3 GFLOPS More than 4x better floating-point performance
Significantly higher texture rate 102.5 GTexel/s vs 25.06 GTexel/s More than 4x higher texture rate
Higher clock speed 915 MHz vs 783 MHz More than 15% higher clock speed
Much better cloud gate factor score 20.91 vs 11.92 More than 75% better cloud gate factor score
Significantly more texture mapping units 112 vs 32 80 more texture mapping units
Significantly more shading units 1,344 vs 192 1152 more shading units
Higher pixel rate 25.62 GPixel/s vs 6.26 GPixel/s More than 4x higher pixel rate
Much higher memory clock speed 1,502 MHz vs 902 MHz More than 65% higher memory clock speed
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
Better video composition score 69.27 frames/s vs 21.68 frames/s Around 3.2x better video composition score
Significantly better PassMark direct compute score 2,578 vs 716 More than 3.5x better PassMark direct compute score
Wider memory bus 256 bit vs 128 bit 2x wider memory bus

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 750 Ti Fake Card vs 670

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 670
97.36 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 670
42.55 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 670
1,143.56 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Comments

comments powered by Disqus