GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs 205 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher effective memory clock speed | 5,400 MHz | vs | 800 MHz | 6.8x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly better PassMark score | 3,699 | vs | 126 | More than 29.2x better PassMark score | |||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 1,020 MHz | vs | 589 MHz | Around 75% higher clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | vs | 6.4 GB/s | 13.5x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 1,728 GFLOPS | vs | 22.43 GFLOPS | More than 77x better floating-point performance | |||
| Significantly higher texture rate | 82.64 GTexel/s | vs | 2.36 GTexel/s | More than 35x higher texture rate | |||
| More memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 512 MB | 4x more memory | |||
| Much higher memory clock speed | 1,502 MHz | vs | 400 MHz | More than 3.8x higher memory clock speed | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 16.32 GPixel/s | vs | 2.36 GPixel/s | Around 7x higher pixel rate | |||
| More shading units | 640 | vs | 8 | 632 more shading units | |||
| More texture mapping units | 40 | vs | 4 | 36 more texture mapping units | |||
| More render output processors | 16 | vs | 4 | 12 more render output processors | |||
| Wider memory bus | 128 bit | vs | 64 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
| |||||||
| Lower TDP | 31W | vs | 60W | Around 50% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs 205
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
Features Key features of the GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs 205
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $274 | ||
| GeForce GTX 960 vs 750 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $200 | $274 | |
| GeForce GTX 660 vs 750 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| GeForce GTX 760 vs 750 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| GeForce GTX 950 vs 750 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| Radeon R7 260X vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| GeForce GTX 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
 | VS | |
| $280 | ||
| Radeon RX 580 vs GeForce GTX 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| GeForce GTX 960 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| GeForce GTX 960 vs 750 Ti | ||
