Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 1,020 MHz vs 400 MHz More than 2.5x higher clock speed
Better floating-point performance 1,728 GFLOPS vs 25.6 GFLOPS 67.5x better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 82.64 GTexel/s vs 3.2 GTexel/s More than 25.8x higher texture rate
Higher pixel rate 16.32 GPixel/s vs 1.6 GPixel/s Around 10.2x higher pixel rate
More shading units 640 vs 16 624 more shading units
More render output processors 16 vs 4 12 more render output processors
More texture mapping units 40 vs 8 32 more texture mapping units
Front view of GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel

Reasons to consider the
Intel GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel

Report a correction
Lower TDP 12W vs 60W 5x lower TDP

Features Key features of the GeForce GTX 750 Ti  vs 8200M G mGPU Intel 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

GeForce GTX 750 Ti
16.32 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

GeForce GTX 750 Ti
82.64 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers

Specifications Full list of technical specs


GeForce GTX 750 Ti  vs
8200M G mGPU Intel 
GPU brand Nvidia Nvidia
GPU name GM107 MCP79
Clock speed 1,020 MHz 400 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti 1 GHz 2 GB None

noise and power

TDP 60W 12W

raw performance

GeForce GTX 750 Ti  vs
8200M G mGPU Intel 
Shading units 640 16
Texture mapping units 40 8
Render output processors 16 4
Pixel rate 16.32 GPixel/s 1.6 GPixel/s
Texture rate 82.64 GTexel/s 3.2 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 1,728 GFLOPS 25.6 GFLOPS


comments powered by Disqus