Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti based on its benchmarks.
See full details | GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs 910M |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
6.5 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
| |||||||
Better PassMark score | 3,699 | vs | 475 | More than 7.8x better PassMark score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed | 5,400 MHz | vs | 1,800 MHz | 3x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Higher clock speed | 1,020 MHz | vs | 775 MHz | More than 30% higher clock speed | |||
Higher memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | vs | 14.4 GB/s | 6x higher memory bandwidth | |||
Higher texture rate | 82.64 GTexel/s | vs | 12.4 GTexel/s | Around 6.8x higher texture rate | |||
Better floating-point performance | 1,728 GFLOPS | vs | 297.6 GFLOPS | More than 5.8x better floating-point performance | |||
Slightly more memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
Higher pixel rate | 16.32 GPixel/s | vs | 3.1 GPixel/s | More than 5.2x higher pixel rate | |||
Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,502 MHz | vs | 900 MHz | More than 65% higher memory clock speed | |||
Better T-Rex score | 2.93 frames/s | vs | 0.57 frames/s | More than 5x better T-Rex score | |||
More shading units | 640 | vs | 96 | 544 more shading units | |||
More texture mapping units | 40 | vs | 16 | 24 more texture mapping units | |||
More render output processors | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
Higher battlefield 4 framerate | 35 | vs | 7.3 | More than 4.8x higher battlefield 4 framerate | |||
Better manhattan score | 3,702.15 | vs | 1,730.77 | Around 2.2x better manhattan score | |||
| |||||||
Lower TDP | 33W | vs | 60W | 45% lower TDP |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
960 vs 750 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | $274 | |
660 vs 750 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
760 vs 750 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
R7 260X vs 750 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
950 vs 750 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
R9 270 vs 750 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
R9 270X vs 750 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1060 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R9 380 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R9 390 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs R9 290X | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 970 | ||