GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 750 Ti vs 9500 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.2

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Report a correction
Significantly better PassMark score 3,699 vs 279 More than 13.2x better PassMark score
Much higher effective memory clock speed 5,400 MHz vs 1,600 MHz Around 3.5x higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly higher clock speed 1,020 MHz vs 550 MHz More than 85% higher clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 86.4 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s Around 3.5x higher memory bandwidth
Much better cloud gate factor score 17.81 vs 5.31 More than 3.2x better cloud gate factor score
Better floating-point performance 1,728 GFLOPS vs 89.6 GFLOPS More than 19.2x better floating-point performance
Significantly higher texture rate 82.64 GTexel/s vs 8.8 GTexel/s Around 9.5x higher texture rate
More memory 2,048 MB vs 512 MB 4x more memory
Much higher memory clock speed 1,502 MHz vs 800 MHz Around 90% higher memory clock speed
Significantly better ocean surface simulation score 849.54 frames/s vs 56.84 frames/s Around 15x better ocean surface simulation score
Higher pixel rate 16.32 GPixel/s vs 4.4 GPixel/s Around 3.8x higher pixel rate
More shading units 640 vs 32 608 more shading units
Significantly better PassMark direct compute score 1,830 vs 51 Around 36x better PassMark direct compute score
More texture mapping units 40 vs 16 24 more texture mapping units
More render output processors 16 vs 8 Twice as many render output processors
Front view of GeForce GT 9500

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 9500

Report a correction
Slightly lower TDP 50W vs 60W More than 15% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GT 9500

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 750 Ti
56.77 mPixels/s
GeForce GT 9500
0.61 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 750 Ti
849.54 frames/s
GeForce GT 9500
56.84 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 750 Ti
568.19 mInteraction/s
GeForce GT 9500
5.62 mInteraction/s

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

Read more

Comments

Showing 1 comment.
What, hahahahah!
comments powered by Disqus