Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details | GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GT 9500 |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Value | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
6.3 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
| |||||||
Significantly better PassMark score | 3,699 | vs | 279 | More than 13.2x better PassMark score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much higher effective memory clock speed | 5,400 MHz | vs | 1,600 MHz | Around 3.5x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Significantly higher clock speed | 1,020 MHz | vs | 550 MHz | More than 85% higher clock speed | |||
Higher memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | vs | 25.6 GB/s | Around 3.5x higher memory bandwidth | |||
Much better cloud gate factor score | 17.81 | vs | 5.31 | More than 3.2x better cloud gate factor score | |||
Better floating-point performance | 1,728 GFLOPS | vs | 89.6 GFLOPS | More than 19.2x better floating-point performance | |||
Significantly higher texture rate | 82.64 GTexel/s | vs | 8.8 GTexel/s | Around 9.5x higher texture rate | |||
More memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 512 MB | 4x more memory | |||
Much higher memory clock speed | 1,502 MHz | vs | 800 MHz | Around 90% higher memory clock speed | |||
Significantly better ocean surface simulation score | 849.54 frames/s | vs | 56.84 frames/s | Around 15x better ocean surface simulation score | |||
Higher pixel rate | 16.32 GPixel/s | vs | 4.4 GPixel/s | Around 3.8x higher pixel rate | |||
More shading units | 640 | vs | 32 | 608 more shading units | |||
Significantly better PassMark direct compute score | 1,830 | vs | 51 | Around 36x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
More texture mapping units | 40 | vs | 16 | 24 more texture mapping units | |||
More render output processors | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| |||||||
Slightly lower TDP | 50W | vs | 60W | More than 15% lower TDP |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
750 Ti vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
750 Ti vs 760 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | $200 | |
750 Ti vs 660 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
750 Ti vs 950 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
750 Ti vs R7 260X | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
750 Ti vs R9 270 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
750 Ti vs 1030 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
970 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
750 Ti vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
750 Ti vs 950 | ||