Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GT 9500 |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 750 Ti vs 9500 among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.3 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 TiGPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly better PassMark score | 3,699 | vs | 279 | More than 13.2x better PassMark score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much higher effective memory clock speed | 5,400 MHz | vs | 1,600 MHz | Around 3.5x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 1,020 MHz | vs | 550 MHz | More than 85% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | vs | 25.6 GB/s | Around 3.5x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Much better cloud gate factor score | 17.81 | vs | 5.31 | More than 3.2x better cloud gate factor score | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 1,728 GFLOPS | vs | 89.6 GFLOPS | More than 19.2x better floating-point performance | |||
| Significantly higher texture rate | 82.64 GTexel/s | vs | 8.8 GTexel/s | Around 9.5x higher texture rate | |||
| More memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 512 MB | 4x more memory | |||
| Much higher memory clock speed | 1,502 MHz | vs | 800 MHz | Around 90% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly better ocean surface simulation score | 849.54 frames/s | vs | 56.84 frames/s | Around 15x better ocean surface simulation score | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 16.32 GPixel/s | vs | 4.4 GPixel/s | Around 3.8x higher pixel rate | |||
| More shading units | 640 | vs | 32 | 608 more shading units | |||
| Significantly better PassMark direct compute score | 1,830 | vs | 51 | Around 36x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| More texture mapping units | 40 | vs | 16 | 24 more texture mapping units | |||
| More render output processors | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| |||||||
| Slightly lower TDP | 50W | vs | 60W | More than 15% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GT 9500
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $274 | ||
| 750 Ti vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $274 | $200 | |
| 750 Ti vs 660 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $274 | ||
| 750 Ti vs 760 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $274 | ||
| 750 Ti vs R7 260X | ||
| | VS |  |
| $274 | ||
| 750 Ti vs 950 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $274 | ||
| 750 Ti vs R9 270 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $274 | ||
| 750 Ti vs R9 270X | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| 750 Ti vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 960 vs R9 380 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 390 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
