GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs 1050 |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 750 Ti vs 1050 among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Slightly lower TDP | 60W | vs | 75W | 20% lower TDP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 1,354 MHz | vs | 1,020 MHz | Around 35% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 7,008 MHz | vs | 5,400 MHz | Around 30% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | vs | 16.32 GPixel/s | More than 2.8x higher pixel rate | |||
| Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 1,455 MHz | vs | 1,085 MHz | Around 35% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,752 MHz | vs | 1,350 MHz | Around 30% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Better fire strike factor score | 41.35 | vs | 33.8 | More than 20% better fire strike factor score | |||
| Higher battlefield 4 framerate | 54 | vs | 35 | Around 55% higher battlefield 4 framerate | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs 1050
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Battlefield 4
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
Read more
Comments
Showing 7 comments.
