Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Report a correction
Much higher effective memory clock speed 5,400 MHz vs 2,100 MHz More than 2.5x higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly higher clock speed 1,020 MHz vs 650 MHz More than 55% higher clock speed
More memory 2,048 MB vs 896 MB More than 2.2x more memory
Better floating-point performance 1,305.6 GFLOPS vs 604.8 GFLOPS Around 2.2x better floating-point performance
More shading units 640 vs 216 424 more shading units
Higher memory clock speed 1,350 MHz vs 1,050 MHz Around 30% higher memory clock speed
Significantly lower TDP 60W vs 171W 2.8x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Reasons to consider the
ZOTAC GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Report a correction
Higher memory bandwidth 117.6 GB/s vs 86.4 GB/s More than 35% higher memory bandwidth
Much wider memory bus 448 bit vs 128 bit 3.5x wider memory bus
More texture mapping units 72 vs 40 32 more texture mapping units
More render output processors 28 vs 16 12 more render output processors

Features Key features of the GeForce GTX 750 Ti  vs 260 Core 216 

memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

GeForce GTX 750 Ti
16.32 GPixel/s
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
18.2 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

GeForce GTX 750 Ti
40.8 GTexel/s
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
46.8 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

GeForce GTX 750 Ti
1,305.6 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

Specifications Full list of technical specs


GeForce GTX 750 Ti  vs
260 Core 216 
GPU brand Nvidia Nvidia
GPU name GM107 GT200 B3
Market Desktop Desktop
Clock speed 1,020 MHz 650 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 576 MHz 896 MB

raw performance

Shading units 640 216
Texture mapping units 40 72
Render output processors 16 28
Pixel rate 16.32 GPixel/s 18.2 GPixel/s
Texture rate 40.8 GTexel/s 46.8 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 1,305.6 GFLOPS 604.8 GFLOPS


GeForce GTX 750 Ti  vs
260 Core 216 
Memory clock speed 1,350 MHz 1,050 MHz
Effective memory clock speed 5,400 MHz 2,100 MHz
Memory bus 128 bit 448 bit
Memory 2,048 MB 896 MB
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR3
Memory bandwidth 86.4 GB/s 117.6 GB/s

noise and power

TDP 60W 171W


comments powered by Disqus