0 Comments
| | GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs 285 |
Released February, 2014
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- 1 GHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
by techPowerUp!We also reviewed cards with custom coolers from board partners today, and their cards improve on these noise levels some more, which makes the GTX 750 Ti an excellent choice if you don't need much gaming performance, but want a very quiet experience.
VS
Released December, 2008
Nvidia GeForce GTX 285
- 648 MHz
- 1 GB GDDR3
by hassan-mujtaba (Aug, 2014)This suggests that the Tonga GPU is highly efficient and AMD took this approach due to NVIDIA’s recent Kepler launches which turned out to deliver great performance at absolute low TDPs of 65W (GeForce GTX 750 series).
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 1,020 MHz | vs | 648 MHz | More than 55% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better passmark score | 3,689 | vs | 1,266 | Around 3x better passmark score | |||
| Significantly higher effective memory clock speed | 5,400 MHz | vs | 2,484 MHz | Around 2.2x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| More memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 1,728 GFLOPS | vs | 708.5 GFLOPS | Around 2.5x better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher texture rate | 82.64 GTexel/s | vs | 51.8 GTexel/s | Around 60% higher texture rate | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,502 MHz | vs | 1,242 MHz | More than 20% higher memory clock speed | |||
| More shading units | 640 | vs | 240 | 400 more shading units | |||
| |||||||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 159 GB/s | vs | 86.4 GB/s | Around 85% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Much wider memory bus | 512 bit | vs | 128 bit | 4x wider memory bus | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| More texture mapping units | 80 | vs | 40 | Twice as many texture mapping units | |||
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs 285
Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
3,689
GeForce GTX 285
1,266
Features Key features of the GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs 285
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
86.4 GB/s
GeForce GTX 285
159 GB/s
GeForce GTX 750 Ti | by techPowerUp!I also found memory overclocking on our sample to be quite limited, worse than other GTX 750 Ti cards using the same memory chips.
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
16.32 GPixel/s
GeForce GTX 285
20.7 GPixel/s
GeForce GTX 750 Ti | by techPowerUp!So take NVIDIA's improvements today and factor in the additional improvements from a 20 nm production process and we could see a new breed of high-end GPUs from the company that uses less power than existing mid-range GPUs today (think of a 100 W Titan).
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
82.64 GTexel/s
GeForce GTX 285
51.8 GTexel/s
GeForce GTX 750 Ti | by techPowerUp!Normally you'd just increase clocks until the card becomes unstable; now, you have to carefully go up in steps, measuring performance every time to find out where the drop occurs.
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
1,728 GFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285
708.5 GFLOPS
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
GeForce GTX 285
240
GeForce GTX 285 | by Slobodan-Simic (Aug, 2014)Despite these few leaked pictures, we still do not have precise specifications for the upcoming R9 285 graphics card as it is still not clear if it will have 1792 or 2048 Stream Processors.
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
GeForce GTX 750 Ti | by techPowerUp!The GM107 hence features a total of 640 CUDA cores and 48 TMUs.





