GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 750 Ti vs 465 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.3

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 465 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 465  based on its benchmarks.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 1,020 MHz vs 608 MHz Around 70% higher clock speed
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 5,400 MHz vs 3,208 MHz Around 70% higher effective memory clock speed
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 20,401 vs 12,970 More than 55% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Better PassMark score 3,699 vs 2,950 More than 25% better PassMark score
Higher texture rate 82.64 GTexel/s vs 26.75 GTexel/s More than 3x higher texture rate
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Better floating-point performance 1,728 GFLOPS vs 855.4 GFLOPS More than 2x better floating-point performance
Much higher memory clock speed 1,502 MHz vs 802 MHz More than 85% higher memory clock speed
Better fire strike factor score 33.8 vs 19.42 Around 75% better fire strike factor score
More shading units 640 vs 352 288 more shading units
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,830 vs 1,101 More than 65% better PassMark direct compute score
Much lower TDP 60W vs 200W 3.3x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 465

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 465

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 19,100 vs 5,378 More than 3.5x better 3DMark06 score
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
Higher memory bandwidth 102.7 GB/s vs 86.4 GB/s Around 20% higher memory bandwidth
Wider memory bus 256 bit vs 128 bit 2x wider memory bus

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs 465

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 750 Ti
182.53 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 465
64.49 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 750 Ti
56.77 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 465
19.08 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 750 Ti
849.54 frames/s
GeForce GTX 465
741.3 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Reviews Word on the street

Comments

comments powered by Disqus