Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 465
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 465 based on its benchmarks.
See full details GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs 465 |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 750 Ti vs 465 among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.3 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Nvidia GeForce GTX 465GPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 1,020 MHz | vs | 608 MHz | Around 70% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly higher effective memory clock speed | 5,400 MHz | vs | 3,208 MHz | Around 70% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 20,401 | vs | 12,970 | More than 55% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Better PassMark score | 3,699 | vs | 2,950 | More than 25% better PassMark score | |||
| Higher texture rate | 82.64 GTexel/s | vs | 26.75 GTexel/s | More than 3x higher texture rate | |||
| More memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 1,728 GFLOPS | vs | 855.4 GFLOPS | More than 2x better floating-point performance | |||
| Much higher memory clock speed | 1,502 MHz | vs | 802 MHz | More than 85% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Better fire strike factor score | 33.8 | vs | 19.42 | Around 75% better fire strike factor score | |||
| More shading units | 640 | vs | 352 | 288 more shading units | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 1,830 | vs | 1,101 | More than 65% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Much lower TDP | 60W | vs | 200W | 3.3x lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark06 score | 19,100 | vs | 5,378 | More than 3.5x better 3DMark06 score | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 102.7 GB/s | vs | 86.4 GB/s | Around 20% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 128 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs 465
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Reviews Word on the street
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $274 | ||
| GeForce GTX 960 vs 750 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $200 | $274 | |
| GeForce GTX 660 vs 750 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| GeForce GTX 760 vs 750 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| GeForce GTX 950 vs 750 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| Radeon R7 260X vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti | ||
