GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 750 Ti vs 660 among Desktop GPUs


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more


Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more


Overall Score

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti  based on its noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1,020 MHz vs 823 MHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 1,085 MHz vs 888 MHz More than 20% higher turbo clock speed
Better bitcoin mining score 173.22 mHash/s vs 62.66 mHash/s More than 2.8x better bitcoin mining score
Lower TDP 60W vs 130W 2.2x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 660

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

Report a correction
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 179.2 GB/s vs 86.4 GB/s More than 2x higher memory bandwidth
Higher texture rate 79 GTexel/s vs 40.8 GTexel/s Around 95% higher texture rate
Significantly more texture mapping units 96 vs 40 56 more texture mapping units
Better floating-point performance 1,896.2 GFLOPS vs 1,305.6 GFLOPS More than 45% better floating-point performance
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
More shading units 1,152 vs 640 512 more shading units
Wider memory bus 256 bit vs 128 bit 2x wider memory bus
Better fire strike factor score 44.27 vs 33.8 More than 30% better fire strike factor score

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs 660

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 750 Ti
173.22 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 660
62.66 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 750 Ti
44.94 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 660
31.19 mPixels/s

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 3

Reviews Word on the street

GeForce GTX 750 Ti  vs 660 

GPU Temperature ComparisonIdleLoadPalit GTX 750 Ti StormX Dual28°C69°CNVIDIA GTX 750 Ti30°C66°CASUS GTX 750 Ti OC28°C62°CMSI GTX 750 Ti Gaming27°C56°C Important: GPU temperature will vary depending on clock speed, voltage settings, cooler design, and production variances.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Read more


Showing 25 comments.
This information is completely false. As far as I know, a TI card is better than the non TI card. The 660 says to have a 7.2 gaming rating. The 660 TI has 6.7. This is when you know they screwed it up.
4K on the 750ti is in most cases pretty laughable but honestly at 1080p I have been very surprised by what it can do.
The 750 ti can run low spec games at 4k like LOL, CsGo, etc, it's not a bad card and it is made for those games not for stuff like Witcher 3 or GTA V.
a 750ti could barely run 4k at 5 fps, what a load of bullshit.
it means you can watch something at 4k not play it in 4k
4k??? you make me laugh!!!!
It says on the box it supports 4K, I haven't tested my self as I only have a 1080p monitor and don't wish to get a 4K one as I find it a little OTT really...
I think OP made a typo and meant IV ;) Though I'm eagerly awaiting the V release, I think my 750 Ti should hold out at 1080p :)
4k with a 750 ti... lawlz
No... GTA V is not out on PC until March time. GTA V on console is out though.
GTA V has been out on the pc for a long time now....
I don't think this is legit... GTA V is not out on PC, and I highly doubt that the 750ti could run games at 4K at more than 30fps...
I think the Disqus website Staff made good job ,and it is true with one incorrect parameter like GEORGE (below) wrote.There is plenty of various other factors that are or arent helping the GPU 's depending of type of motherboard,chipset,technologies it uses,it often is good idea to have a PC parts from the same Provider-ASUS and GIGABYTE in my opinion are working nice together
Hehe but it is anomaly my gtx 750 or what it really makes me happy and gives more pleasure during gaming-it doesnt sound like 4x ak 47 shooting burst full auto constantly......Regards
I am shocked a little bit .....I have both gtx 750 not Ti normal but it is 2048 mb GDDR5 Ram,and also gigabyte's GTX 660 .Well i thought (my 660 card just died no reason founded) now I bought Gtx 750 and believe me it is in my opinion the gtx 750 better than gtx 660 :1st all games that I love to play on reg.basis (WAR THUNDER,GTA 5,ARMA 3,MAX PAYNE 2,Crisis3,NFS Rivals,Dead Space 3,ROME 2 total war,and many other) are smoothly playable at 2 times higher resolution than previously GTX 660 (1920/1080 60 refresh rate) on max .highhest det.set -some of them especially WAR THUNDER GROUND FORCES was a slideshow.Now with GTX 750 I use 1080 p 3840x2460 HD (4x) also on full sets and it doesent even drop the FPS lower than 30 in all games ,what is also cool-it (750gtx) is silent even when it has to grind a massive graphics and the Tractors engine of Gigabyte gtx 660 made me insane
This website has an awful typesetting. It shows the best specifications on the left without saying wich gpu they are talking about. Also, on the top they show both gpus, what makes you think that the left one is the winner, while — as on this post — it may be exactly the opposite.
Yes. Compare george's comment for proof
Just correct it!
This is already updated?
results look better if you use ASUS versions
The GTX 750ti has 70% higher pixel rate? The pixel rates are obvious incorrect. The GTX 750ti has about 16 Gpixels/s and the GTX 660 about 23 Gpixels/s wich mean that the GTX 660 has 40% higher pixel rate. The other specs are correct.
This page isn't incorrect... the only advantage in specs term is that the GTX 750 ti has lower power consuption and TDP.
seems pretty legit to me
This page is incorrect, As Naveed requested, please update.
the information is false please update.
comments powered by Disqus