GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 750 Ti vs 660 Ti among Desktop GPUs


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more


Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more


Overall Score

GeForce GTX 660 Ti 

GPUBoss recommends the GeForce GTX 660 Ti  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1,020 MHz vs 915 MHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 1,085 MHz vs 980 MHz More than 10% higher turbo clock speed
Better bitcoin mining score 182.53 mHash/s vs 102.46 mHash/s Around 80% better bitcoin mining score
Higher battlefield 3 framerate 50 vs 46.4 Around 10% higher battlefield 3 framerate
Significantly lower TDP 60W vs 150W 2.5x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 660 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Generic GeForce GTX 660 Ti

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 22,997 vs 5,378 More than 4.2x better 3DMark06 score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 27,687 vs 20,401 More than 35% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Higher memory bandwidth 144.2 GB/s vs 86.4 GB/s More than 65% higher memory bandwidth
Better PassMark score 4,686 vs 3,699 More than 25% better PassMark score
Significantly more texture mapping units 112 vs 40 72 more texture mapping units
Higher effective memory clock speed 6,008 MHz vs 5,400 MHz More than 10% higher effective memory clock speed
Better floating-point performance 2,459.5 GFLOPS vs 1,728 GFLOPS More than 40% better floating-point performance
More shading units 1,344 vs 640 704 more shading units
Higher pixel rate 25.62 GPixel/s vs 16.32 GPixel/s More than 55% higher pixel rate
Higher texture rate 102.5 GTexel/s vs 82.64 GTexel/s Around 25% higher texture rate
Better cloud gate factor score 20.13 vs 17.81 Around 15% better cloud gate factor score
More render output processors 24 vs 16 8 more render output processors
Higher crysis 3 framerate 30.3 fps vs 20.4 fps Around 50% higher crysis 3 framerate
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 62.9 fps vs 46.7 fps Around 35% higher BioShock infinite framerate
Wider memory bus 192 bit vs 128 bit 50% wider memory bus
Better PassMark direct compute score 2,546 vs 1,830 Around 40% better PassMark direct compute score

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs 660 Ti

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 750 Ti
182.53 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
102.46 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 750 Ti
56.77 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
35.9 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Reviews Word on the street


Showing 4 comments.
i have the 660 ti and it has good performance over 750 ti the only thing that the 750 ti wins over 660 ti is power consumption and that's it.
750ti wins but yet all the benchmarks go to the 660ti? wtf
Well I'm still none the wiser thanks to this very confusing layout; which card is on the right? It seems to swap.
This isn't right at all...The Effective memory clock, memory bandwidth, pixel rate, and texture rate for the 750 ti are all wrong. most of them are Way wrong...
comments powered by Disqus